Did ETS Coverage and Free Allowances Affect Economic Performance and GHG Emissions in the EU?: Evidence from a Panel of EU Sectors
EU排出量取引制度（ETS）のカバレッジと無償割り当ては経済パフォーマンスと温室効果ガス排出に影響を与えたか？：EUセクターパネルデータからの証拠 (AI 翻訳)
Aydin, Asli, Acar, Sevil
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はEU ETSのセクター別影響を1995-2020年のパネルデータで分析。ETS対象は付加価値と総生産に負の影響を与えるが、GHG排出削減には有意な効果がないことを発見。無償割り当ての効果も不十分で、政策設計の改善が必要と示唆。
English
This study analyzes the sectoral impacts of the EU ETS using panel data from 1995-2020. It finds that ETS coverage negatively affects value added and gross output but does not significantly reduce GHG emissions. Free allowances are insufficient, highlighting the need for improved policy design.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は2023年度からGX-ETS（グリーントランスフォーメーション排出量取引制度）を開始したばかり。本稿のセクター別分析結果は、日本の制度設計（特に無償割り当てと競争力への影響）に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As the EU ETS is the world's largest carbon market, this sector-level analysis provides crucial insights for global carbon pricing design, especially regarding the trade-off between emissions reduction and economic competitiveness. Findings on free allowances are relevant for upcoming ETS reforms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Empirical evidence on ETS impacts at sector level, useful for carbon pricing research and policy evaluation.
🏢実務担当者:Understanding sector-specific impacts helps in assessing compliance costs and competitiveness risks under carbon pricing.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for targeted strategies and flexible mechanisms to balance economic and environmental goals in ETS design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study analyzes the impacts of the European Union Emissions Trading System and free allowances on sectoral value added, gross output, and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union for the period 1995-2020. Since the European Union Emissions Trading System inherently covers firm-level emissions, most studies in this area have been conducted at the firm level. However, a sectoral analysis allows understanding how sectors as a whole respond to the carbon pricing mechanism in terms of carbon reductions, competitiveness and sectoral output growth. It can also reveal how changes differ across sectors subject to different regulations. Controlling for sectoral employment, intermediate input use, and time effects, the results show that European Union Emissions Trading System coverage has a negative impact on both value added and gross output, but does not lead to a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The findings indicate that more labor-intensive and less input-intensive production can reduce emissions. Furthermore, the study draws attention to the competitive losses caused by compliance costs in sectors within the scope of the European Union Emissions Trading System and shows that the impact of free allowances on performance is insufficient. These results highlight the importance of coherent and inclusive approaches in policy design to more effectively manage the economic and environmental impacts of the European Union Emissions Trading System. It is recommended to develop more targeted and flexible strategies, taking into account sectoral differences.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.15353/rea.v17i4.6385first seen 2026-05-14 21:15:25
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。