Respecting tenure and the bundle of rights in blue carbon guidance
ブルーカーボンガイダンスにおけるテニュアと権利の束の尊重 (AI 翻訳)
Sarah Lawless, Philippa J. Cohen, Rayhan Dudayev, Elizabeth Evans-Illidge, Catherine E. Lovelock, Bob Muir, Emily Ogier, Sisir Pradhan, Tiffany H. Morrison
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ブルーカーボン（BC）プロジェクトは沿岸地域や先住民の領域で提案されているが、テニュア（占有権）の保護状況は不透明である。122件のBCガイダンス文書を分析した結果、権利の解釈が狭く、国際的な義務（先住民条約など）が無視されていることが判明。これにより権利保持者が土地や資源を失うリスクがある。ガイダンスはテニュアの包括的な理解と国際基準への準拠が必要である。
English
Blue carbon (BC) projects are proposed in coastal and indigenous territories, but tenure security remains unclear. Analysis of 122 BC guidance documents reveals narrow rights interpretation and neglect of international obligations (e.g., Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention), exposing rightsholders to dispossession. Guidance must adopt a comprehensive tenure view and align with global standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもブルーカーボン（藻場・干潟等）のプロジェクトが進行中だが、テニュアに関する議論はまだ発展途上。本論文は、権利保護の国際基準（ILO169号等）を参照すべき点を示唆しており、今後の日本国内のBCガイドライン策定に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, blue carbon projects are expanding under voluntary carbon markets and national NDCs. This paper highlights a critical governance gap: tenure rights are often overlooked, undermining project integrity and social safeguards. It calls for alignment with international human rights standards, which is essential for credible carbon crediting and financing.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systematic analysis of tenure references in blue carbon guidance, revealing gaps in rights interpretation.
🏢実務担当者:Offers concrete recommendations for integrating tenure security into blue carbon project design and documentation.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need to incorporate international tenure obligations (e.g., ILO Convention 169) into national blue carbon frameworks.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Blue carbon (BC) projects are proposed in the territories of coastal communities, small-scale fishers and Indigenous peoples, yet how the tenure security of rightsholders is conveyed or protected remains uncertain. Here, by analysing 122 BC guidance documents (scientific, policy and technical), we examine the claims, obligations and interpretations of tenure. The documents reveal overlapping and/or competing claims about interactions between BC and tenure rights, ranging from rights-eroding to rights-securing. Despite increased openness to different forms of tenure, only a subset of tenure rights consistently receive emphasis. Six core international obligations to tenure (including the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention) are overlooked. Ambiguity surrounding tenure implications, coupled with disregard for global obligations and narrow rights interpretation, exposes rightsholders to potential land and resource dispossession, and exclusion from benefits. To rectify this, BC guidance must adopt a more comprehensive view of tenure, engage with international standards and rights experts, and ensure accountability to rightsholders. Blue carbon projects are expanding, yet their implications for tenure security remain uncertain. Analysis of 122 guidance documents reveals that rights are narrowly interpreted and key international obligations are overlooked, leaving rightsholders vulnerable to dispossession and exclusion.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02651-8first seen 2026-06-17 05:53:37 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:14:15
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。