ANALISIS TREN DAN RESEARCH GAP TEKNOLOGI CARBON CAPTURE BERBASIS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PRISMA DAN ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK
PRISMA系統的レビューと書誌分析に基づく炭素回収技術のトレンドと研究ギャップの分析 (AI 翻訳)
Syamsurizal
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、2025～2026年の炭素回収技術に関する文献を系統的レビューと書誌分析により評価し、技術・経済・環境の統合的評価の欠如が主な研究ギャップであると指摘する。特に、TEAとLCAが別々に行われており、システムレベルの統合フレームワークが不足している。AIや最適化手法の導入が進んでいるが、依然として材料・プロセス研究が支配的である。
English
This systematic review and bibliometric analysis of carbon capture literature (2025–2026) identifies the lack of integrated techno-economic and life cycle assessment as a key research gap. While AI-based modeling and optimization are emerging, most studies remain material- and process-focused. The authors call for multi-objective optimization frameworks combining TEA and LCA to improve economic viability and environmental sustainability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はCCUS技術の実証・商用化を進めており、本レビューの示すTEA-LCA統合の欠如は、国内の事業化評価にも課題を投げかける。特に、SSBJやグリーントランスフォーメーション政策の下での投資判断には、総合的な評価枠組みが不可欠である。
In the global GX context
Globally, carbon capture is a critical pillar of net-zero strategies. This review highlights a persistent gap in integrated TEA–LCA frameworks, which is relevant for ISSB and transition finance disclosure requiring comprehensive sustainability assessments. The findings underscore the need for standardized evaluation methods to support CCUS deployment at scale.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful mapping of research gaps in carbon capture, particularly the need for integrated TEA-LCA and AI-driven optimization approaches.
🏢実務担当者:Provides an overview of methodological gaps that affect project feasibility assessments; limited direct operational guidance.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for policy frameworks that incentivize holistic evaluation of carbon capture projects across technical, economic, and environmental dimensions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstrak. Perkembangan teknologi carbon capture menjadi elemen penting dalam strategi dekarbonisasi global, namun implementasinya memerlukan evaluasi komprehensif yang mencakup aspek teknis, ekonomi, dan lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tren dan kesenjangan metodologis dalam literatur carbon capture periode 2025–2026 menggunakan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dan analisis bibliometrik terhadap 45 artikel terpilih. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penelitian masih didominasi studi berbasis material dan proses dengan fokus pada peningkatan kapasitas adsorpsi, sementara pendekatan berbasis kecerdasan buatan dan optimasi sistem mulai meningkat. Evaluasi techno-economic assessment (TEA) dan life cycle assessment (LCA) masih terbatas dan umumnya dilakukan secara terpisah. Research gap utama terletak pada belum terintegrasinya evaluasi kinerja teknis, kelayakan ekonomi, dan dampak lingkungan dalam satu kerangka analisis sistem-level yang terpadu. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya pengembangan model integratif TEA–LCA berbasis optimasi multi-objektif untuk meningkatkan kelayakan ekonomi dan keberlanjutan lingkungan teknologi carbon capture. Kata kunci: carbon capture, techno-economic assessment, life cycle assessment, systematic literature review, sustainability evaluation. Abstract. The development of carbon capture technologies plays a critical role in global decarbonization strategies; however, large-scale implementation requires comprehensive evaluation across technical, economic, and environmental dimensions. This study analyzes research trends and methodological gaps in carbon capture literature during 2025–2026 using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis of 45 selected articles. The results indicate that research remains predominantly focused on material- and process-based studies aimed at enhancing adsorption capacity, while artificial intelligence–based modeling and system optimization approaches are increasingly adopted. Techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) remain limited and are generally conducted separately. The primary research gap lies in the lack of integrated system-level frameworks that simultaneously evaluate technical performance, economic feasibility, and environmental impacts. These findings highlight the need for integrated TEA–LCA models supported by multi-objective optimization to improve the economic viability and environmental sustainability of carbon capture technologies. Keywords: carbon capture, techno-economic assessment, life cycle assessment, systematic literature review, sustainability assessment.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.33005/jurnaltekkim.v21i02.100first seen 2026-06-19 04:56:05
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。