Correction: Study on the path of green total factor productivity improvement in forestry in China under spatio-temporal heterogeneity: based on dynamic QCA analysis
時空間不均一性下における中国林業のグリーン全要素生産性向上経路に関する研究:動的QCA分析に基づいて(訂正) (AI 翻訳)
Deya Xu, Yunfan Zhang, Congcong Cao, Yuan Wang, Zhen Lin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は中国30省の2005〜2022年のパネルデータを用い、林業のグリーン全要素生産性(GTFP)を測定し、時空間分布と地域格差を分析した。動的QCAにより、資源資本主導、資本主導、資源産業主導、管理産業主導の4つの経路と6つの構成モードを特定し、林業のグリーン成長の多様な駆動メカニズムを解明した。
English
Using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces (2005-2022), this study measures forestry green total factor productivity (GTFP) with a global super-efficiency SBM model, analyzes spatiotemporal patterns and regional disparities, and applies dynamic QCA to identify six configuration modes across four pathways (resource-capital, capital, resource-industry, management-industry) for enhancing forestry GTFP, revealing diverse driving mechanisms for green growth.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の林業は炭素吸収源として重要であり、GTFP向上の分析は森林経営の効率化や地域活性化に示唆を与える。ただし、SSBJや開示制度との直接的な関連は薄く、政策立案や林業経営の参考として位置づけられる。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to global forestry efficiency literature by providing empirical evidence from China, the world's largest afforestation nation, on how regional configurations drive green productivity. It offers insights for sustainable forest governance and climate mitigation strategies, relevant to international frameworks like the SDGs and NbS.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a methodological framework (dynamic QCA) for analyzing configurational paths to green productivity in forestry, useful for comparative studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into resource allocation and management strategies that can enhance forestry efficiency, relevant for forestry enterprises and regional planners.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of regional-specific policies and institutional innovation in promoting forestry green growth, informing climate and land-use policy design.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Introduction: Under the common agenda of addressing global climate change and promoting sustainable development, forestry has become a key area for achieving carbon neutrality and ecological product value. Forestry green total factor productivity (GTFP) is a core indicator for measuring the low-carbon transformation and green growth capacity of forestry. Methods: Based on panel data from 30 provinces (regions) in China from 2005 to 2022, this study uses the global super efficiency SBM model to measure forestry GTFP in each province, combines the center of gravity model and spatial autocorrelation analysis to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and evolutionary trends of forestry GTFP, applies the Dagum Gini coefficient to decompose regional differences and their sources, and identifies multidimensional configurational paths for enhancing provincial forestry GTFP through the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method, revealing the forestry green growth patterns and their driving mechanisms under different combinations of conditions. Results: (1) The overall trend of forestry GTFP showed a fluctuating upward trend, with the mean increasing from 0.75 to 1.27. The spatial pattern evolved from local point aggregation to multipolar diffusion, and high-value areas exhibited significant spatial spillover effects; (2) The overall differences in forestry GTFP show a fluctuating convergence trend, with the overall Gini coefficient decreasing from 0.275 to 0.198. Regional differences are the main source of overall imbalance, and some low-value areas exhibit catch-up effects; (3) The seven conditional variables are not necessary conditions, and six configuration modes are identified for four paths: resource capital driven, capital driven, resource industry driven, and management industry driven. Discussion: Based on these findings, this study proposes to build a new pattern of new quality productivity of forestry that is oriented toward consolidating foundational capacity, centered on improving quality and efficiency, with institutional innovation as the guiding thread, and ensured through full-process regulation and management. KEYWORDS configuration perspective, dynamic QCA, forestry green total factor productivity, IMO model, upgrading pathwaysAgainst the backdrop of accelerating climate change, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem degradation, forests, as the dominant component of terrestrial ecosystems, play an irreplaceable role in carbon sequestration, ecosystem stability, and green economic growth (Gorain et al., 2025). Reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) emphasize that reliance on forest area expansion alone is no longer sufficient to meet global climate targets (Psistaki et al., 2024) enhancing the efficiency of forest resource allocation and ecological output under resource and environmental constraints has become a critical pathway for achieving Nature-based Solutions (NbS) and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (Seddon et al., 2021;Murphy et al., 2025). Nevertheless, whether ecological protection objectives can be achieved in tandem with improvements in resource use efficiency remains a central and unresolved challenge in global sustainable forestry. As the world's largest artificial afforestation nation with continuously expanding forest resources, China has advanced green forestry development amid rapid industrialization and ecological civilization construction. It's practices offer a representative real-world case study for examining the synergistic relationship between enhancing green efficiency and ecological conservation. Accordingly, examining the level and driving mechanisms of forestry green efficiency in China provides valuable insights for developing countries pursuing climate mitigation and green transition. It also offers empirical evidence for understanding trade-offs and synergies among multiple objectives in global sustainable forest governance.The realization of forest ecological function and multiple benefits is not a natural spontaneous process, but largely depends on the forestry management mode, resource allocation structure and management efficiency level. Forestry is an important ecological cornerstone for the harmonious coexistence of humans and nature, and its development has significant implications for people's well-being and ecological security. As an ideal carrier for cultivating and developing new productive forces, forestry shoulders the mission of the times given by the construction of ecological civilization, which is the key path to realize the transformation from "lucid waters and lush mountains" into "mountains of gold and silver" (Feng and Cao, 2021). In recent years, General Secretary Xi Jinping has repeatedly emphasized the necessity of coordinating the integrated protection and systematic management of mountains, waters, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and deserts, and has called for the accelerated development of green and low-carbon industries to enhance the diversity, stability, and sustainability of ecosystems. These directives have endowed high-quality forestry development with new contemporary significance and systematic practical requirements. However, at present, China still faces the problems of forest land resource degradation, ecosystem service function decline, extensive development of forestry industry and insufficient management efficiency (Liu et al., 2023), which seriously restrict the optimal allocation of forestry resources, ecological function improvement and green transformation and upgrading. In order to realize the sustainable development of forestry and the coordinated growth of ecological economy, improving the level of Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP) has become the core scale and key breakthrough to promote the new quality productive forces in forestry (Liu et al., 2025;Qiu and Yang, on forestry efficiency has a from a economic to green on the of factor to economic In recent years, has resource environmental and ecosystem service into the a of The can be into on the on the and spatial of forestry GTFP as regional spillover convergence and structure (Liu et al., et al., the is to the analysis of the of forestry The the of ecological et al., et al., et al., as and and forest protection and and et al., 2023), and factor allocation et al., the and economic as et al., 2023), construction et al., green and 2024) and green et al., as as of mechanisms as environmental regulation and et al., 2024) and forest resource protection et al., on the driving mechanisms of forestry green total factor productivity (GTFP) can be into of a efficiency as et al., et al., et al., and et al., to efficiency and dynamic These are by spatial as the spatial model and the spatial model to spatial spillover and regional et al., et al., by panel to the of The a of (QCA) to from multiple and paths to the has to different of and forestry economic and forestry efficiency improvement et al., et al., that forestry development is by and the of a of has to dynamic in on forestry forest ecological product and carbon efficiency et al., et al., et al., 2025). These reveal that to forestry efficiency improvement are not but in to in conditions, and factor the of key driving and their to be its to multiple real-world to the the of dynamic have largely on with to key at the regional forestry GTFP level. Under development and regional which combinations of and can promote forestry which are this the study the core can the spatiotemporal and of forestry green total factor productivity (GTFP) be a can the multiple and their dynamic forestry GTFP be identified from a of as to to the by regional this the study a systematic analysis four efficiency spatiotemporal and pathway forestry GTFP is a global SBM model and its and spatial patterns are through analysis and spatial autocorrelation the Dagum Gini coefficient and its are to reveal the spatial of forestry GTFP from the of overall and and their this study dynamic (QCA) into forestry GTFP multiple configurational and their that forestry GTFP improvement from a this are insights to high-quality green development in the forestry total factor productivity as a the that natural and ecological are and It the economic growth that capital and and to and efficiency However, this has in the of forest are and in ecological service and their and resource and environmental GTFP the of into a for ecological not forestry efficiency in of economic output but also its capacity to well-being ecological In a productivity that economic with ecological Forestry GTFP has endowed forestry productivity with new at of from to The forestry GTFP through the of ecological as carbon and biodiversity as and as a component of of output not forces the efficiency to the between and but also the core role of forestry in the realization of ecological product et al., (2) of from to Based on the characteristics of forestry forestry GTFP sustainability and as the core of growth at the of ecological capacity is to be et al., that forestry development has from scale expansion to sustainable development, which is in with the of green development and ecological civilization of from to Forestry GTFP forestry as an of the efficiency is not a of factor but an of the between institutional and resource and systematic through the of provides a for understanding the of forestry efficiency and to the configuration analysis path with as the of forestry GTFP a of synergistic among natural and institutional under regional conditions. It multiple resource and ecological with its by significant and the model in are forestry on natural capital green is not a of but through dynamic to factor allocation and mechanisms as institutional and management. characteristics of and the model as its foundational to the of forestry GTFP and The resource
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2026.1833216first seen 2026-08-02 18:57:18 · last seen 2026-08-02 18:57:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。