Assessing the Contribution of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Towards Organisational Biodiversity Footprints
温室効果ガス排出が組織の生物多様性フットプリントに与える影響の評価 (AI 翻訳)
Charlotte Maddinson, Sami El Geneidy, Maiju Peura, Janne Kotiaho, Joseph Bull
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この研究は、GHG排出が組織の生物多様性フットプリントにどの程度寄与するかを評価した。平均して、経済セクターの生物多様性フットプリントの47%をGHG排出が占めると推定されるが、これは観測された気候変動による生物多様性損失よりも高く、フットプリント手法の限界を示唆する。全体として、生物多様性フットプリントは気候変動と生物多様性損失の関連を探る有用だが不完全なツールであると結論付けている。
English
This study assesses how much GHG emissions contribute to organizational biodiversity footprints across economic sectors. On average, GHG emissions account for 47% of a sector's total biodiversity footprint, a proportion higher than observed biodiversity loss from climate change, highlighting methodological limitations. The authors conclude that biodiversity footprinting is a useful but imperfect tool for examining the climate-biodiversity nexus.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではTNFDや統合報告書での生物多様性開示が進む中、本論文はGHG排出削減が生物多様性にも寄与する可能性を定量的に示しており、企業の二酸化炭素以外の環境影響評価に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
In the global context of TNFD and CSRD biodiversity reporting, this paper provides empirical evidence on the overlap between climate and biodiversity footprints, urging caution in interpretation of footprinting methods.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a critical evaluation of biodiversity footprinting methods and the contribution of GHG emissions, useful for researchers in corporate biodiversity accounting.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use these findings to understand potential co-benefits of GHG mitigation for biodiversity, but should be aware of methodological limitations.
🏛政策担当者:Regulators developing biodiversity disclosure standards should note the significant but uncertain contribution of GHGs to biodiversity footprints.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Organisations play a key role in addressing climate change and biodiversity loss, which are closely connected. Biodiversity footprinting has initially suggested that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions may contribute to a large proportion of many organisations' biodiversity impacts. If true, mitigating GHG emissions could help organisations to tackle their climate and biodiversity liabilities in tandem. Consequently, there is a need for greater understanding of (i) how much GHG emissions contribute to biodiversity footprints across economic sectors and (ii) how reliable current footprinting methods are at estimating the impact of GHG emissions. On average, our results estimate that GHG emissions contribute to 47% of an economic sector's total biodiversity footprint. This proportion is much higher than studies into observed biodiversity loss from climate change, which may be due to the methodological limitations of footprinting approaches. Overall, we find that biodiversity footprinting provides a useful but imperfect tool to interrogate the connections between climate change and biodiversity loss in organisations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71206first seen 2026-06-29 06:00:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。