Green Financing and Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Economies through Key Sustainability Indicators
グリーンファイナンスと持続可能な起業：主要な持続可能性指標による先進国と発展途上国の比較分析 (AI 翻訳)
Meryem Raissi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、30カ国のデータを用いて、グリーンファイナンス、ESG、イノベーションなどの指標を主成分分析し、持続可能性主導型、技術主導型、遅れている国の3つの類型を特定。制度の質がグリーンファイナンスと持続可能な起業家精神の関係を媒介することを示し、政策への示唆を提供する。
English
This study uses PCA on 30 countries' green finance, ESG, innovation indicators to identify three typologies: sustainability-driven, tech-driven, and lagging economies. It finds institutional quality mediates the relationship between green finance and sustainable entrepreneurship, offering policy implications for green finance infrastructure and ESG regulation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文は、国際比較を通じて日本のグリーン成長戦略における制度の質の重要性を示唆しており、SSBJや有報でのESG開示強化にも関連する洞察を提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global understanding of how green finance and sustainability indicators interact across countries, relevant to frameworks like the Green Finance Network and ESG rating convergence.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a cross-country typology and methodological approach using PCA for sustainability indicators, useful for further analysis of green finance and entrepreneurship.
🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can benchmark their country's performance on green finance and innovation indicators.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can use the typology to design targeted green finance and innovation support policies, and to prioritize interventions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
As economies worldwide confront the urgent need to transition toward low-carbon and socially inclusive development models, the interaction between green finance, sustainable entrepreneurship, and innovation ecosystems has become central to both academic debate and policy agendas. This article investigates how these dimensions jointly shape national trajectories across 30 developed and developing countries by combining key sustainability indicators, including the Green Growth Index, Global Green Finance Index, Global Innovation Index, ESG scores, and the number of unicorns. Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), the study identifies two main latent dimensions integrated sustainability and technological dynamism and reveals a typology of sustainability-driven, tech-driven, and lagging economies. Countries such as Switzerland and Sweden demonstrate a strong convergence between ESG performance, green growth, and innovation capacity, whereas others, including the United States, India, and Kenya, exhibit more fragmented patterns. The findings highlight the critical mediating role of institutional quality in translating green financial flows and innovative potential into sustainable entrepreneurial outcomes. For policymakers, the results offer a comparative diagnostic tool to prioritise interventions in green finance infrastructure, ESG regulation, and ecosystem support, and to design more inclusive regional cooperation frameworks. The study also points to avenues for future research, including the integration of blue economy indicators and subnational data, as well as the use of causal modelling approaches, to further inform evidence-based strategies for sustainable and resilient development. Keywords: finance; sustainable entrepreneurship; ESG; innovation; green and blue economy; Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2026.v15n1p202first seen 2026-05-14 21:24:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。