Governing Energy Transitions under System Complexity:Why Coordination Failures Persist despite Networked Governance
システム複雑性下でのエネルギー移行のガバナンス：ネットワーク型ガバナンスにもかかわらず調整不全が持続する理由 (AI 翻訳)
Mikael Johnson
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
エネルギー移行において、相互依存するアクターやインフラ間の調整不全が持続する理由を、供給チェーン型ガバナンスとサービスネットワーク型システムのミスマッチとして理論化。ネットワーク型ガバナンスは部分的な適応に留まると論じる。
English
This article argues that persistent coordination failures in energy transitions stem from a mismatch between supply-chain governance assumptions and the service-network logic of modern energy systems. Networked governance arrangements only partially address interdependence without reforming underlying governance logics.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のエネルギー政策は、系統安定化や需要調整などシステム調整課題に直面しており、本稿の枠組みは制度設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As energy systems become more complex globally, this conceptual framework helps explain why governance reforms (e.g., in EU or US) often fail to resolve coordination problems entirely.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical lens for analyzing governance failures in socio-technical transitions.
🏢実務担当者:Useful for understanding structural barriers to coordination in multi-stakeholder energy projects.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to shift from linear accountability to system-level governance design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Energy transitions increasingly depend on coordination across interdependent actors, infrastructures and practices. As electrification, sector coupling and decentralisation reshape energy systems, governance challenges have shifted from control-oriented delivery towards problems of interaction, responsibility and system coordination. Despite wide recognition of these dynamics, governance arrangements continue to struggle with persistent coordination failures across institutional contexts. This article argues that such difficulties cannot be explained as implementation problems or insufficient cooperation alone. Instead, coordination failures are conceptualised as manifestations of a mismatch between how energy systems function and how they are governed. The article distinguishes between supply-chain governance assumptions and energy systems operating as service networks, developing an analytical framework that makes this mismatch explicit. The analysis demonstrates how prevailing governance remains oriented towards linear responsibility and asset-based performance, even as outcomes increasingly depend on coordinated action and resource integration in use. Network-based governance arrangements are shown to represent partial adaptations that acknowledge interdependence without reconfiguring underlying governance logics. By foregrounding system logics rather than specific instruments, the article clarifies why coordination failures persist in sustainability transitions characterised by complex socio-technical interdependence.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202606.2227.v1first seen 2026-07-20 04:53:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。