（不）公正なエネルギー・モビリティ転換
(Un)just energy and mobility transitions (原題)
Era Purike, Arfin Sudirman, Darmansjah Djumala, Deasy Silvya Sari, Akihisa Mori, Andi Muh. Dzul Fadli, Oekan Soekotjo Abdoellah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、エネルギー・モビリティ転換がニッケル等クリティカルミネラル需要を急増させ、インドネシアの原鉱輸出禁止が中国資本の精錬・専用石炭火力投資を招いた経緯を分析する。政治生態学と政治経済学を統合し、中国系精錬所・大手鉱山・零細採掘・地域社会からなる階層的権力構造が生態劣化と社会的不平等を深刻化させていると示す。政府・企業がニッケルを開発の不可欠要素と語る言説が異論を排除する構造を明らかにし、公正な転換の課題を提示する。
English
This study examines how the energy and mobility transition's demand for critical minerals like nickel led Indonesia to ban raw ore exports, attracting Chinese investment in smelting and captive coal power at high ecological and social cost. Integrating political ecology and political economy, it reveals a hierarchical power structure—Chinese smelters, large miners, artisanal miners, and local communities—that deepens ecological degradation and inequality. It shows how state and corporate narratives framing nickel as essential to development sideline dissent, with implications for just, sustainable transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業はEV向けニッケル調達でインドネシア依存を強めており、SSBJ・Scope 3開示における人権・環境デューデリジェンスや調達先の公正性評価を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
As global disclosure regimes (CSRD, ISSB, TCFD) push supply-chain and social-risk transparency, this paper highlights how critical-mineral sourcing for EVs carries justice and governance risks that disclosure frameworks increasingly must capture.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:クリティカルミネラル供給網の権力構造と公正転換を政治生態学・政治経済学で統合分析する枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:EV向けニッケル調達における人権・環境リスクとサプライチェーンの公正性デューデリジェンスの重要性を再認識させる。
🏛政策担当者:資源ナショナリズムと外資誘致が地域社会・環境に与える影響を踏まえ、公正な転換政策設計の必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The transition of energy and mobility systems from fossil fuel-based to renewable energy and battery electric vehicles boosts the demand for critical minerals such as nickel. Indonesia’s ban on exporting unprocessed nickel ore has successfully attracted Chinese investment in smelting operations and captive coal power plants, though this has come at considerable ecological and social cost. Few studies have examined power relations and institutions of the nickel value chain at the global, national, and local levels, with its serious local social and environmental implications. This study takes an integrated approach, combining political ecology and political economy to analyze the structural dynamics of capital accumulation and interactions between governance and power relations. The analysis uncovers a hierarchical power structure that includes Chinese smelters, large mining companies, artisanal and small-scale mining, and local communities, exacerbating ecological deterioration and social inequalities. We emphasize how government and corporate narratives portray nickel as essential for economic development, often thereby sidelining dissenting voices. Findings offer a thorough understanding of the power dynamics at play and their consequences for achieving sustainable and equitable energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4324/9781042018000-11first seen 2026-11-02 04:38:47 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:36:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。