Emissions and Impacts of the Cement Industry Sector Through a Review of Mitigation Technologies and Ecological Risks
セメント産業セクターの排出と影響:緩和技術と生態リスクのレビューを通じて (AI 翻訳)
Jordana Georgin, D. Franco, Claudete Gindri Ramos, N. El Messaoudi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは187の論文を系統的に分析し、セメント産業の排出と緩和技術を大気・水・土壌・騒音のマルチメディア枠組みで評価。クリンカー代替と代替燃料で最大50%の直接排出削減、CCSで90%削減可能だがエネルギー負荷あり。CBAMやESG開示などの2026年市場メカニズムとの整合を論じ、産業競争力と環境管理の両立を図る。
English
A systematic review of 187 articles evaluating cement industry emissions and mitigation technologies via a multimedia framework covering air, water, soil, and noise. Clinker substitution with alternative fuels can cut direct emissions up to 50%; integrated carbon capture (TRL 7-9) reduces exhaust by 90% but with energy penalties. The study links mitigation pathways to 2026 market mechanisms including CBAM and mandatory ESG disclosures.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のセメント産業(太平洋セメントなど)はGX政策の重点分野。本レビューの統合的枠組みは、有報や統合報告書での環境情報開示に示唆を与え、CBAM対応の参考となる。
In the global GX context
Cement is a hard-to-abate sector central to global decarbonization. This review's multimedia approach and linkage to CBAM/ESG disclosures align with ISSB and CSRD requirements, offering a sociotechnical roadmap for stakeholders navigating 2026 market mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a holistic multimedia framework for assessing cement industry impacts and mitigation, integrating biogeochemical and digital paradigms.
🏢実務担当者:Identifies actionable mitigation technologies (clinker substitution, alternative fuels, CCS) and links them to regulatory and market drivers like CBAM and ESG.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for context-dependent policies that balance emission reductions with industrial competitiveness under upcoming carbon border adjustments and disclosure mandates.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study reviewed 187 articles based on systematic review guidelines to evaluate pollution controls through a novel analytical multimedia framework that bridges air, water, soil, and acoustic compartments, alongside emerging digital and circular economy paradigms. With 5–7% of worldwide CO2 emissions originating in the cement industry, fugitive particulate matter constitutes more than 90% of a plant’s emissions. The results show that the cement sector has considerable potential for decarbonization, though highly context-dependent. Under optimal conditions, clinker substitution coupled with alternative fuels could reduce direct emissions by up to 50% and total energy usage by 44%, constrained by regional material availability. Fully integrated carbon capture systems (TRL 7–9) could reduce exhaust emissions by up to 90%, contingent upon overcoming significant energy penalties. Engineering controls in dry-process mills reduced daily occupational noise exposure from 102.9 to 88.3 dB(A). Regarding soil pollution, cement kiln dust increased the unconfined compressive strength of native soils up to 9.9 times for geotechnical stabilization. In water management, hybrid biological systems removed 94.5% of particulate matter and reduced oxygen demand by over 87%, while advanced biomonitoring decreased effluent toxicity by over 90%. The significance of this study lies in overcoming traditional siloed assessments by introducing a holistic multimedia framework that maps biogeochemical interconnectivity alongside Industry 4.0 paradigms. Ultimately, this review provides a vital sociotechnical road map for stakeholders to align localized ecological risk mitigation with stringent 2026 global market mechanisms, such as the carbon border adjustment mechanism and mandatory environmental, social and governance disclosures, ensuring both industrial competitiveness and environmental stewardship.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/14/7383/pdf?version=1784457330first seen 2026-07-25 05:31:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。