Unpacking energy equity: a UK expert and public elicitation scoping study
エネルギー・エクイティを解き明かす：英国の専門家と市民への意見聴取によるスコーピング研究 (AI 翻訳)
George W. Warren, Christian Calvillo, Gesche Huebner
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
英国のエネルギー移行における「エネルギー・エクイティ」の概念を明確化するため、2025年に専門家7名と一般市民8名への半構造化インタビューを実施。エネルギー正義とは異なり、ニーズに基づくエネルギーサービスの公平な分配を中心に、時間・空間・社会・政治の各スケールで定義された。この研究は将来のデルファイ調査の準備段階であり、公平な移行のための指標や施策への示唆を提供する。
English
This scoping study clarifies the concept of 'energy equity' in the UK context through 15 semi-structured interviews with experts and the public in 2025. Energy equity is defined as needs-based fair distribution of energy services, distinct from energy justice, spanning temporal, spatial, societal, and political scales. The findings inform metrics and approaches for a fair, inclusive energy transition and lay groundwork for a Delphi consensus study.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX移行でも、再エネ賦課金の負担やEV普及の地域格差など不公平が議論されている。本論文のエネルギー・エクイティの定義とスケールは、日本の公正な移行論や地域政策設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As global GX strategies accelerate, distributional fairness is a growing concern, reflected in just transition frameworks and climate policy. This paper adds conceptual clarity and measurement dimensions for energy equity, useful for policymakers designing inclusive net-zero strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー・エクイティの概念的定義と測定次元を整理しており、今後の実証研究に利用できる。
🏢実務担当者:移行計画やステークホルダー対応で、公平性指標を考慮する際の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:公正な移行政策の設計にあたり、ニーズに基づくサービス分配や時間・空間スケールの多様性を考慮すべきと示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Peer-reviewed paper 1–046–26 The UK energy system continues to transform in response to attempts to mitigate climate change. Growing scepticism towards the energy transition has prompted calls from researchers, practitioners and political bodies for equitable, inclusive and just transitions to overcome existing inequities and avoid future unfair distribution of costs and benefits of attempts to reach net zero greenhouse gases. While energy poverty, justice and sufficiency are established terms in energy research, energy equity is not clearly defined. This is despite equity being a core part of other disciplines including public health and environmental research. We undertook 15 semi-structured interviews with two subsamples (eight members of the public and seven academic experts) in 2025 to better understand meanings of energy equity, its conceptual value, the impact of equity approaches, and how these might be measured in the UK context. This work additionally serves as a scoping study for a wider Delphi study to create consensus on energy equity. Participants outlined meanings of energy equity separate to energy justice, centred around equitable needs-based distribution of energy services. Energy equity was defined by a range of energy activities wider than simply demand, and temporal, spatial, societal and political scales. Participants also outlined a range of impacts of, and factors that might influence, inequities and approaches to addressing them, as well as metrics to measure these in the UK context. Findings from this study offer insight into the conceptual potential of energy equity as a goal, process, analytical framework and tool for fair, inclusive energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.66506/essp.1-046-26first seen 2026-07-31 05:20:38 · last seen 2026-07-31 05:20:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。