Sustainable construction systems: an investigation into the use of materials and techniques that promote sustainability in buildings - Critical literature review
持続可能な建設システム：建物の持続可能性を促進する材料と技術の使用に関する調査 - 批判的文献レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Matheus Vinicius Pinheiro Aristimunho
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、建設業界における持続可能な材料と技術に関する半系統的文献レビューを実施。再生骨材、グリーンコンクリート、土系材料、ジオポリマー、Green BIMなどの代替手法の環境的利点を評価する一方、熱帯気候や長期耐久性データの不足など研究ギャップを指摘。文脈に応じた科学的研究の必要性を強調している。
English
This paper presents a critical semi-systematic literature review on sustainable materials and techniques in building construction. It evaluates alternatives such as recycled aggregates, green concrete, earthen materials, geopolymers, and Green BIM, highlighting environmental benefits while noting gaps in long-term durability, economic feasibility, and tropical climate studies. The review calls for context-specific research to advance truly sustainable construction.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では建設分野のCO2削減が急務であり、本レビューはグリーンコンクリートや地産材料の活用など、日本の建設業界が参考にできる持続可能な技術の現状と課題を整理している。ただし日本の気候・規制に特化した分析ではないため、直接適用には補完的検討が必要。
In the global GX context
This review provides a global overview of sustainable construction materials and techniques, relevant to international GX efforts in the building sector. It identifies research gaps in tropical climates and durability, which can inform global green building standards and future studies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:A comprehensive synthesis of sustainable construction materials and methods, identifying key research gaps for future work.
🏢実務担当者:An overview of available sustainable materials and digital tools (e.g., Green BIM) that can be considered for building projects.
🏛政策担当者:Evidence that context-specific building codes and incentives are needed to promote sustainable materials beyond temperate regions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The construction industry has been one of the largest consumers of natural resources and a significant emitter of greenhouse gases worldwide. Traditional materials, such as Portland cement and steel, drive high energy consumption, substantial carbon emissions, and massive solid waste generation. The general objective of this article is to synthesize evidence on sustainable materials and techniques, and the specific objective is to evaluate their advantages, disadvantages, and implications for future research. This study presents a critical semi-systematic literature review examining materials and techniques that advance sustainability in building construction. While conventional practices dominate, a growing body of evidence supports the adoption of alternatives, including recycled aggregates, green concrete, earthen materials (such as adobe, rammed earth, and soil-cement), geopolymers, and digital tools like Green BIM. Although these approaches demonstrate clear environmental benefits, the literature reveals important limitations: most studies focus on temperate climates, lack long-term durability data, and under-explore economic feasibility and social dimensions in tropical contexts such as Brazil’s Midwest region. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research gaps, this review underscores the urgent need for context-specific scientific investigations. The findings provide a foundation for advancing truly sustainable construction practices that balance environmental, economic, and social imperatives.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v15i4.50863first seen 2026-06-29 07:03:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。