Market Mechanisms for Carbon Dioxide Removals: An Overview
二酸化炭素除去のための市場メカニズム：概要 (AI 翻訳)
Verbist, Flore, Jagu Schippers, Emma, Johnstone, Injy, Seralta, Coline, Presty, Romain, Theocharidou, Antigoni
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、二酸化炭素除去（CDR）を炭素市場に統合する現状と可能性を探る。自主的、準コンプライアンス、コンプライアンス市場の3つのメカニズムを分析し、恒久的CDRの展開にはコンプライアンス市場と政策支援が重要であると結論づける。
English
This review explores the integration of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) into carbon markets, covering voluntary, quasi-compliance, and compliance mechanisms. It finds that permanent CDR deployment requires compliance markets and targeted policy support, with hybrid models emerging. The paper highlights the need for robust accounting and certification procedures.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX政策の一環として炭素価格制度が進められているが、CDRの市場統合はまだ議論途上。本レビューは、日本が今後の永久CDR活用や市場設計を検討する上での国際的な知見を提供する。
In the global GX context
As jurisdictions like the EU and UK begin incorporating CDR into their ETS, this review provides a timely overview of market mechanisms. It informs the global debate on how to scale CDR through policy integration and certification, relevant for both voluntary and compliance markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured taxonomy of CDR market mechanisms and identifies key barriers to scaling, useful for further research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers strategic insights on the evolving landscape of carbon credits and the shift toward compliance integration for CDR.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the role of hybrid policy models combining markets and public support, informing the design of effective CDR deployment frameworks.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose of review: Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) is deemed critical to achieve the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement, underscoring the need for robust and scalable CDR markets. This review explores how CDR has been, and could increasingly be, integrated into existing and emerging carbon markets. Recent findings: Despite growing policy attention, the deployment of CDR, especially permanent forms, remains marginal and challenging to scale within existing carbon pricing and crediting frameworks. Although certification schemes are becoming more tailored to the unique characteristics of different CDR approaches, cost disparities between permanent removal credits and cheaper emissions avoidance credits continue to hinder uptake. In response, several jurisdictions are exploring hybrid policy models that combine market-based mechanisms with public financial support. Additionally, increasing interlinkages between carbon market mechanisms are expected to facilitate more effective and widespread integration of CDR over time. Summary: The report provides an overview of the role of CDR across three types of carbon market mechanisms: voluntary, quasi-compliance, and compliance-based systems. It highlights the defining features and interconnections among these markets, and assesses how each framework contributes to the deployment of removals, in particular novel CDR. While voluntary markets serve as innovation hubs for CDR, their limited scalability and voluntary nature highlight the importance of compliance markets and targeted policy support for permanent CDR. Those quasi-compliance and compliance markets, including mechanisms under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and Emissions Trading Systems (ETS) like UK and EU ETS, are beginning to incorporate CDR more explicitly. This signals a shift toward broader carbon market integration and geographical coverage, requiring robust accounting and certification procedures for both emission reduction and removal projects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-025-00277-6first seen 2026-05-14 21:17:31
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。