炭素金融の台頭：計量書誌学的視点
The Rise of Carbon Finance: A Bibliometric Perspective (原題)
Yaacob Ibrahim, Khaled Hussainey, Emmanuel Allieu, Hosam Mohamed Ragab Moubarak, Hebatallah Abd El Salam Badawy, Taghred Mokhtar Sayed Moawad
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
1993〜2026年のScopus論文1610件を対象に、炭素金融研究の成長、知的構造、国際共著、テーマ進化を計量書誌学的に分析。パリ協定後に急増し、中国が生産量を、米英日が被引用影響力で主導。テーマは炭素市場・排出量取引からグリーン金融、ESG統合、気候関連金融リスク、デジタル金融へ移行している。
English
A bibliometric analysis of 1,610 Scopus-indexed carbon finance publications (1993–2026) mapping growth, intellectual structure, collaboration, and thematic evolution. Output surged after the Paris Agreement; China leads volume while the US, UK, and Japan show strong citation influence. Themes shift from carbon markets and emissions trading toward green finance, ESG integration, climate-related financial risk, and digital finance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
炭素金融の研究潮流を俯瞰する材料として、SSBJ・有報開示やトランジション金融の議論を日本企業が整理する際の参照枠になる。日本の被引用影響力の高さは国内研究の国際発信余地を示す。
In the global GX context
Useful for situating carbon finance within the broader ISSB/TCFD and transition-finance literature, showing how the field has financialized from carbon markets toward ESG and climate-risk disclosure. It offers standard-setters and investors a structural map of where evidence is concentrated and where gaps remain.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素金融研究の知的構造と未開拓領域を把握するための出発点となる書誌マップ。
🏢実務担当者:ESG・気候リスク・転換金融の議論がどこへ向かうかの潮流把握に使える。
🏛政策担当者:炭素市場からグリーン金融への政策関心の移行を裏付ける証拠として参照可能。
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Carbon finance has emerged as a critical mechanism for mobilizing capital toward climate change mitigation and supporting the transition to low‐carbon economies. However, its intellectual development remains fragmented across environmental economics, financial economics, sustainability, and climate policy. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric assessment of carbon finance research, examining its growth trajectory, intellectual structure, collaboration patterns, thematic evolution, and emerging research frontiers. Using 1610 Scopus‐indexed publications from 1993 to 2026, the study integrates performance analysis, citation impact, science mapping, network analysis, thematic visualization, Bradford's law, Lotka's law, journal quality indicators, and life cycle analysis. The findings reveal substantial growth, particularly following the Paris Agreement, alongside a concentrated intellectual structure in which China leads publication productivity, whereas the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan demonstrate strong citation influence. Collaboration networks indicate increasing internationalization, although research remains concentrated among a limited number of authors and institutions. Thematic evolution demonstrates a shift from carbon markets, emissions trading, and environmental regulation toward green finance, sustainable investment, climate‐related financial risk, renewable‐energy financing, ESG integration, and digital finance. The study contributes by extending the temporal coverage of previous bibliometric reviews, integrating multiple analytical approaches, and explicitly tracing the progressive financialization of carbon finance. It reconciles divergent patterns in productivity, citation influence, collaboration, and development across countries and disciplines. By identifying structural patterns, emerging themes, and underexplored research frontiers, the study provides an evidence‐based agenda for future research and informs policymakers, standard‐setters, investors, and practitioners seeking to advance sustainable financial systems and climate transition strategies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71753first seen 2026-10-29 04:56:05 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:56:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。