← 論文一覧に戻る

市場制度はグリーンファイナンスを促進するか?一般化信頼の調整効果

Do Market Institutions Promote Green Finance? The Moderating Role of Generalized Trust (原題)

S. Gutman, Maiya M. Egorova

Journal of Applied Economic Research📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-20#気候金融Origin: Global経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: finance
DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2026.25.3.033
原典: https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/o1popwkbpb/118114846.pdf
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、資本主義システムの類型と対人信頼水準がグリーンボンド発行量に与える影響を、2017〜2023年の21カ国パネルデータで分析する。市場制度的要素(PCA1)の効果は信頼水準に依存し、信頼が23〜24%ポイント未満では負、それ以上では正となる非線形関係を確認。BRICS諸国での環境プロジェクト成功には、整備されたフォーマル制度と高い対人信頼の組み合わせが不可欠だと示す。

English

Using 2017–2023 panel data for 21 countries, this study examines how capitalist system type and interpersonal trust affect green bond issuance. The market-institutional component (PCA1) has a nonlinear effect: negative below a trust threshold of 23–24 percentage points, positive above it. At mean trust (44%), market institutions catalyze green finance, highlighting the joint role of formal institutions and social trust, especially in BRICS economies.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、SSBJ・有報開示やトランジション・ファイナンスの拡大を制度的枠組みだけでなく社会的信頼・規範の観点から捉える視点を提供する。グリーンボンド市場の国際比較において、日本の高い対人信頼が資金調達コストや投資家対応に与える含意を考える材料となる。

In the global GX context

For global GX scholarship, this paper adds a sociocultural dimension to green bond market development, complementing TCFD/ISSB disclosure and transition finance frameworks. It suggests that formal market institutions alone are insufficient without social trust, with direct implications for scaling sustainable finance in emerging and BRICS economies.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:グリーンファイナンス研究において、制度類型と社会規範(信頼)の交互作用を非線形にモデル化する手法を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:グリーンボンド発行やサステナブルファイナンス戦略を検討する際、進出国の制度的・社会的文脈を評価する視点を与える。

🏛政策担当者:新興国・BRICSでのグリーンファイナンス政策設計において、フォーマル制度整備と社会的信頼醸成を並行して進める必要性を示唆する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

In the context of the global transition to a low-carbon economy, green finance is becoming a key tool for achieving sustainable development goals. However, the dynamics of the green bond market vary significantly across countries, driven not only by economic but also by institutional and sociocultural factors. This issue is particularly acute in emerging economies and the BRICS bloc, where institutional heterogeneity limits the scaling of sustainable investments. This study examines the impact of capitalist system types and the level of interpersonal trust on green bond issuance volumes. Using panel data for 21 countries from 2017 to 2023, we analyze how the type of capitalist system and the level of interpersonal trust affect green bond emissions. The type of capitalism is defined through principal components (PCA1 and PCA2), constructed based on probabilistic weights of countries’ affiliation with market, Scandinavian, continental, and Asian models. Interpersonal trust is measured as the share of respondents who answered positively to the World Values Survey question regarding whether most people can be trusted. Using a random-effects panel regression model, we establish that the impact of the market institutional component (PCA1) on green bond issuance is not direct but varies depending on the level of interpersonal trust. The results show that at low levels of trust (below 23–24 percentage points), the relationship between PCA1 and green bond issuance is negative. Above this threshold, the effect of PCA1 becomes positive. At the sample mean level of trust (44 percentage points) and higher, the market institutional environment acts as a catalyst for green finance development. The paper shows the nonlinear influence of the capitalist model on the issuance of green bonds, suggests measuring the institutional structure of the economy through its main components, and confirms the crucial role of interpersonal trust in the development of green finance. The findings confirm that the successful launch of environmental projects in BRICS countries depends on a combination of developed formal institutions and a high level of interpersonal trust.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。