Energy: A Chronic Hunger
エネルギー:慢性の飢餓 (AI 翻訳)
Ahmed Mousa Jaafar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、文明におけるエネルギー消費の慢性化を文明論的に考察。エネルギーと知識の関係を再編成として捉え、燃焼集約型から知識集約型文明への移行を提案。ジーボンズのパラドックスやAIのエネルギー消費を分析し、エネルギー飢餓が文明拡大とともに再構成されることを論じる。
English
This paper theoretically examines chronic energy hunger as a civilizational phenomenon, proposing a shift from combustion-intensive to knowledge-intensive civilization. It analyzes Jevons Paradox and AI energy consumption, arguing that energy hunger reconstitutes itself with each expansion and the challenge is to channel it toward a stable knowledge cycle.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策(エネルギー基本計画、グリーン成長戦略)において、単なるエネルギー効率向上だけでなく、社会システムの再設計が必要とする観点は示唆的。ただし抽象度が高く、具体的な政策連動は限定的。
In the global GX context
This paper offers a conceptual framework relevant to global energy transition debates, challenging narrow efficiency-focused approaches. It highlights the Jevons Paradox and the role of knowledge in reshaping energy use, which complements existing TCFD/ISSB discussions on systemic risk.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel theoretical lens linking energy, knowledge, and civilization, useful for interdisciplinary energy studies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This study examines the hypothesis of chronic energy hunger as an enduring civilizational phenomenon — one that cannot be explained solely through resource scarcity or rising material demand, but rather through the ways in which civilizations reorganize and allocate energy across time. The study departs from a critique of the conventional assumption that links progress to the raw increase in energy consumption, proposing instead that a significant dimension of the crisis may be rooted in how energy is distributed and directed within economic, social, and institutional systems. The study adopts a synthetic-analytical approach that draws on the philosophy of technology, strategic analysis, and selected concepts from energy economics, complexity science, innovation studies, and modern computing. It examines the relationship between energy, knowledge, and efficiency as one of reorganization rather than direct substitution — wherein knowledge does not represent an alternative to energy, but rather a different mode of investing and directing it toward long-term, cumulative capabilities. The study advances the concept of a transition from a combustion-intensive civilization to a knowledge-intensive civilization — not as an inevitable shift or a break from physical constraints, but as a transformation in the architecture of energy use and the nature of the value it generates. It further tests the limits of this hypothesis through an analysis of the Jevons Paradox, the boundaries of renewable energy, artificial intelligence's energy consumption, inter-country disparities, and the risks associated with resource reallocation. The study concludes that civilizational progress appears to be tied not merely to increasing the quantities of energy produced, but to the capacity of societies to convert energy into knowledge, organizational efficiency, and future capabilities that are self-reproducing. It proposes that energy hunger may never disappear historically — rather, it reconstitutes itself with each new civilizational expansion — and that the true challenge may lie not in eliminating this hunger altogether, but in constructing an institutional and technological architecture more capable of channeling it away from open-ended combustive depletion and toward a more stable and less destructive knowledge cycle.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20370253first seen 2026-06-14 04:25:41 · last seen 2026-06-16 04:41:18
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。