Same intervention, different outcomes: The politics of energy transition planning in Ghana and Kenya
Gerald Emmanuel Arhin
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
SEforALLのエネルギー転換投資計画をガーナとケニアで比較した質的研究。ガーナでは制度の迂回と国内主体性の欠如により選挙後に計画の優先度が低下した一方、ケニアでは制度側の抵抗が協働を促し政策が定着した。政策の翻訳の成否は技術的能力よりも権力配置・官僚的権限・政治的決着に依存すると論じる。
English
A comparative qualitative study of SEforALL's Energy Transition Investment Plan in Ghana and Kenya. Ghana saw institutional bypass and weak domestic agency, with the plan deprioritized after electoral change; Kenya's institutional resistance forced collaboration and durable policy embedding. Success depends less on technical capacity than on power configuration, bureaucratic authority, and political settlements.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX推進でも、外部支援や国際枠組みを国内政策へ落とし込む際の省庁間権限・政治的調整の重要性を示唆。アジア途上国へのGX支援設計にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Speaks to how global climate imperatives (and donor-backed transition planning) translate into national policy — relevant to ISSB/TCFD-aligned transition plan credibility and to development finance institutions designing transition support.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:政策翻訳・政治決着の理論を途上国エネルギー転換に適用した比較事例として参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:新興国での脱炭素事業・政策関与では制度的主体性と政治的タイミングの見極めが重要と分かる。
🏛政策担当者:外部支援の計画が定着するかは制度設計と政治的过程の順序に左右されると政策的示唆を得られる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Under what conditions does externally supported energy transition planning produce locally owned and sustainable policy outcomes rather than short-lived plans, and what role do institutional gatekeeping, bureaucratic authority, and the sequencing of technical and political processes play in shaping those conditions? To unpack these questions, this paper comparatively analyses SEforALL's Energy Transition Investment Plan development in Ghana and Kenya, revealing striking divergences in processes and outcomes. Drawing on 22 semi-structured interviews and the theories of policy translation and political settlements, the analysis demonstrates that Ghana's experience was characterised by institutional bypass, limited domestic agency, and a significant reduction in the plan's operational priority following electoral change. Kenya's trajectory, conversely, featured institutional resistance that compelled collaborative engagement, resulting in sustainable policy embedding. The findings reveal that successful policy translation depends not merely on technical capacity but on power configuration, bureaucratic authority, and political settlements. This research advances understanding of energy transition politics whilst offering practical insights for international organisations and governments navigating the complex politics of translating global climate imperatives into national policies in developing countries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115641first seen 2026-10-29 04:41:47 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:34:56
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。