gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND CO2 EMISSIONS FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT VEHICLES IN MALAYSIA

マレーシアにおけるエネルギー効率の高い車両のエネルギー消費とCO2排出に関する比較分析 (AI 翻訳)

Siti Hartini Hamdan, Ng Jo-Han

Journal of Transport System Engineering📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-24#EV・輸送経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: automotive
DOI: 10.11113/jtse.v13.264
原典: https://doi.org/10.11113/jtse.v13.264
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

マレーシアの乗用車を対象に、ガソリン車(ICEV)、ハイブリッド車(HEV)、電気自動車(EV)の運用エネルギーとCO2排出量を比較する簡易モデルを構築。HEVとEVはICEV比で年間CO2排出をそれぞれ38.69%、45.96%削減するが、EVの性能は電源構成に強く依存する。シナリオ分析から、電化だけでは不十分で、グリッドの脱炭素化と充電インフラの整備が不可欠と指摘。バランスのとれた移行戦略を提言。

English

This study develops a simplified comparative model for operational energy use and CO2 emissions of gasoline ICEVs, HEVs, and EVs under Malaysian conditions. HEVs and EVs reduce annual operational CO2 by 38.69% and 45.96% respectively, though EV performance heavily depends on the electricity generation mix. Scenario analysis indicates that electrification alone cannot achieve rapid decarbonisation without grid decarbonisation, aggressive adoption, and infrastructure. A balanced transition strategy combining electrification, efficiency improvements, and power-sector decarbonisation is recommended.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

マレーシアの実証データは、日本の自動車産業やエネルギー政策にも示唆を与える。特にEV普及と電源構成の関係は、日本でも同様の課題であり、HEVを含む段階的移行戦略の重要性を再確認させる。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence from a developing economy on the interplay between vehicle electrification and grid emissions, relevant for global transition planning. It supports the ISSB/TCFD emphasis on scenario analysis and balanced strategies for transport decarbonisation.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:The simplified comparative model can be adapted for other countries to assess electrification pathways and the role of HEVs as a bridge technology.

🏢実務担当者:Automotive and energy companies in Southeast Asia can use the findings to inform fleet decarbonisation strategies and investment in charging infrastructure.

🏛政策担当者:The study underscores the need for integrated policies linking EV adoption, grid decarbonisation, and infrastructure, relevant for transport and energy regulators.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Malaysia’s road transport sector contributes significantly to national energy consumption and CO₂ emissions. This study develops a simplified comparative model to assess the operational energy use and CO₂ emissions of gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and electric vehicles (EVs) under Malaysian passenger-car conditions. Useful traction energy was estimated at 13.76%, 23.48%, and 69.19% for ICEVs, HEVs, and EVs, respectively. Compared with ICEVs, HEVs and EVs reduced annual operational CO₂ emissions by 38.69% and 45.96%, respectively, although EV performance remains strongly dependent on the electricity-generation mix. Scenario analysis indicates that electrification alone is unlikely to deliver rapid transport-sector decarbonisation without aggressive adoption, grid decarbonisation, and supporting infrastructure. HEVs and improved ICEV technologies can provide short- to medium-term transition benefits, while EVs offer stronger long-term potential with the expansion of renewable electricity, charging infrastructure, and clear policy support. The findings support a balanced transition strategy that combines electrification, vehicle efficiency improvements, and power-sector decarbonisation.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。