科学計量分析を用いた自然に基づく解決策のための生態系健康評価に関する世界的研究動向
Global research trends in ecosystem health assessment for nature-based solutions using scientometric analysis (原題)
Chhanu Sutradhar, Jayanta Das, Brototi Biswas, Chaitali Mukherjee
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、2015年から2024年までの1273件の論文を科学計量分析し、生態系健康評価と自然に基づく解決策（NbS）の研究動向を明らかにした。研究は学際的で、中国、米国、オーストラリア、英国の機関が中心であり、研究は3段階で発展してきた。将来の研究方向性を示す。
English
This study uses scientometric analysis of 1,273 articles (2015-2024) to map research trends in ecosystem health assessment and nature-based solutions (NbS). It finds the field is multidisciplinary, led by Chinese, US, Australian, and UK institutions, and has evolved in three phases. It offers insights for future research directions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、NbSは生物多様性戦略や気候変動適応策に関連し、企業の自然関連情報開示（TNFD）の文脈で注目される。本研究は、生態系健康評価の研究動向を俯瞰し、日本の研究機関や企業が国際的な研究ネットワークを把握する上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, nature-based solutions are central to climate adaptation and biodiversity frameworks like TNFD and the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. This paper provides a bibliometric overview that can help researchers and policymakers identify key actors and trends in ecosystem health assessment, supporting evidence-based decisions for NbS implementation.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive overview of research trends and key players in ecosystem health assessment, useful for identifying collaboration opportunities and research gaps.
🏢実務担当者:May help sustainability teams understand the scientific landscape of NbS, but offers limited direct operational guidance.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the growing research momentum in ecosystem health, which can inform national strategies for biodiversity and climate adaptation.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Human survival depends on ecosystems, which are an essential component of the earth’s environment. Researchers and professionals are increasingly interested in ecosystem health issues and their nature-based solutions, but disparities persist. A total of 1273 research articles were used after screening and cleaning procedures, ranging from 1st January, 2015, to 31st December, 2024, from the Dimension Core Collection database, and VOSviewer was utilized for scientometric analysis of the development of ecosystem health research and their nature-based solutions after SDGs’ 17 goals were adopted by the UNO to pinpoint the research development. The reviewed findings showed that ecosystem health assessment research is multidisciplinary. The two most influential journals were “The Science of the Total Environment” and “Sustainability”. The main research forces were Chinese, United States, Australian, and United Kingdom researchers and institutions. The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences was the most productive university, followed by Wageningen University & Research and the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research. The ecosystem health assessment review is showing three development trends: (1) Gradually increased phase (2015–2019); (2) Phase of development (2020–2022); and (3) Phase of fast development (2023–2024). The present study offers useful insights for assessing the effectiveness of ecosystem health studies and assists in identifying relevant research works on ecological health research and, ultimately, determines future study directions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04521-xfirst seen 2026-09-03 05:12:44
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。