A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Pricing Schemes on The Cost of Reducing Carbon Emissions In The Java, Madura, and Bali Regional Power Generation Sector
ジャワ・マドゥラ・バリ地域電力部門における炭素排出削減コストに及ぼす炭素価格制度の比較分析 (AI 翻訳)
Disa Amalia
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ジャワ・マドゥラ・バリ（Jamali）地域の電力部門における炭素排出削減コストを、排出量取引制度（ETS）、炭素税と上限（CT）、削減コスト（AC）の3つの炭素価格シナリオで比較分析した。結果、炭素価格の上昇は電力価格を押し上げ、削減コストは政策期間中に大幅に増加し、NZEシナリオでは排出原単位が0.844 tCO2/MWh、削減コストは67 USD/tCO2と推定された。
English
This study compares carbon pricing schemes (ETS, Cap and Tax, abatement cost) for reducing emissions in the Java-Madura-Bali power sector. Results show carbon pricing raises electricity prices, with mitigation costs rising significantly over time; NZE scenarios achieve emission intensity of 0.844 tCO2/MWh at an abatement cost of USD 67/tCO2.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、電力部門の脱炭素化に向けた炭素価格導入の議論が活発であり、本分析は地域電力系統における炭素価格の費用対効果を定量的に示す参考となる。特に、GX経済移行債や排出量取引制度の設計において、電力価格への影響や削減コストの試算は政策立案に有用である。
In the global GX context
This paper provides empirical evidence on carbon pricing effectiveness in a regional power sector, relevant to global discussions on ETS design and carbon tax implementation. It offers insights into cost dynamics and emission reduction pathways that can inform policy in emerging economies and align with ISSB/TCFD disclosure expectations for transition planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides quantitative comparison of carbon pricing instruments in a specific power system, useful for modeling and policy analysis.
🏢実務担当者:Offers cost benchmarks for carbon pricing scenarios that can inform corporate transition planning and disclosure.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights trade-offs between carbon tax and ETS in terms of cost and effectiveness, relevant for policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study conducts a comparative analysis of carbon pricing schemes on reducing carbon emissions in the electricity sector in Java, Madura and Bali (Jamali). The method used is a quantitative simulation of the cost of reducing carbon emissions in the Jamali generation system for three carbon price scenarios: Emission Trading System (ETS), Cap and Tax (CT), and abatement cost (AC). The results show that with a carbon pricing scheme for emission reduction as much as the cost of carbon pricing requires, regardless of the technology, every increase in carbon tax by 1 USD/ton CO2 results in an increase in electricity prices. In contrast, the cost of emission reduction analysis shows that in the initial phase of tariff implementation, the carbon mitigation cost for the carbon tax scheme is around USD 45 million and USD 137 million for the emissions trading scheme (ETS), to reduce emissions by approximately 22 million tons of CO₂. However, this value increases significantly by the end of the policy period, with estimates reaching USD 6 billion per ton of CO₂ for the carbon tax scheme and USD 4 billion per ton of CO₂ in the ETS framework, to achieve the emission reduction target of 48 million tons of CO₂. Meanwhile, the NZE and NZE-CAP scenarios reduce emissions intensity to 0.844 tons of CO₂ per MWh and 0.781 tons of CO₂ per MWh, respectively, with abatement costs of USD 67/ton CO₂ and USD 70/ton CO₂.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.33322/kj6r9019first seen 2026-08-04 04:38:11
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。