水素・太陽光・地熱ハイブリッド建築の動的持続可能性評価:LCA・カーボンフットプリント・エマジー統合モデル
Dynamic Sustainability Synergy Assessment of Hydrogen–Solar–Geothermal Hybrid Energy Buildings: A Coupled LCA-Carbon Footprint-Emergy Modeling Approach (原題)
Nameng Sun, Junxue Zhang, Ashish T. Asutosh, Ge Song
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国のオフィスビルを対象に、LCA・カーボンフットプリント・エマジーを統合した動的モデルで水素・太陽光・地熱ハイブリッドシステムを20年間評価。GWPを29.8%削減し、炭素回収期間は7年だが、非再生可能資源消費は2倍、資源枯渇被害は173%増加。10年目の電解槽交換で360トンの追加排出が発生し、累積正味価値をほぼゼロに戻す。多目的最適化でPV容量200kW、電解槽50kWなどが推奨され、炭素価格は200元/トンで閾値効果がある。
English
This study develops a dynamic LCA-carbon footprint-emergy model to evaluate a hydrogen-solar-geothermal hybrid system for an office building in China over 20 years. Results show a 29.8% reduction in global warming potential with a 7-year carbon payback, but non-renewable resource consumption doubles and resource scarcity damage increases by 173%. Electrolyzer replacement in year 10 causes 360 tonnes of additional emissions, nearly resetting cumulative net value. Multi-objective optimization recommends 200 kW PV, 50 kW electrolyzer, and carbon pricing threshold at 200 RMB/tonne.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の建築分野では、SSBJ開示やZEB推進が進む中、LCAの動的化と炭素・資源の統合評価は重要。本モデルは、設備更新や系統脱炭素化を考慮した評価手法を提供し、日本の建築物のライフサイクル炭素評価や投資判断に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to global building decarbonization by moving beyond static LCA to dynamic coupling frameworks, addressing trade-offs between carbon reduction and resource scarcity. The findings on carbon payback and equipment replacement cycles are relevant for ISSB-aligned reporting and transition finance, offering a methodological basis for integrated carbon-resource-cost evaluation in building sectors worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a dynamic LCA-emergy framework for assessing hybrid energy systems, highlighting non-monotonic carbon payback and resource trade-offs.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for optimizing hybrid system design and managing equipment replacement cycles to balance carbon and resource costs.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests carbon pricing thresholds and multi-level policy coordination to incentivize building decarbonization.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The building sector faces an urgent challenge in balancing carbon neutrality goals with natural resource conservation. This study constructs a three-dimensional dynamic coupling model integrating Life Cycle Assessment, carbon footprint, and emergy analysis to evaluate the sustainability of a hydrogen–solar–geothermal hybrid energy system for an ecological office building in China’s hot summer and cold winter climate zone over a twenty-year horizon. The model incorporates dynamic factors including grid decarbonization, equipment efficiency degradation, and replacement cycles to overcome the systematic bias inherent in static LCA. Results reveal a significant trade-off: the hybrid system achieves a 29.8% reduction in global warming potential with a seven-year carbon payback period, yet non-renewable resource consumption doubles and resource scarcity damage increases by 173%. The carbon payback trajectory exhibits non-monotonic fluctuation, with electrolyzer replacement in year ten generating 360 tonnes of additional emissions that nearly reset the cumulative net value to zero. Multi-objective optimization identifies photovoltaic capacity as the system baseline (170–210 kW) and electrolyzer capacity as the primary regulating variable (35–62 kW), with the TOPSIS-recommended compromise solution of 200 kW photovoltaic, 50 kW electrolyzer, 30 kW fuel cell, and 32 m3 hydrogen storage achieving annual carbon emissions of 280 tonnes and a 33.3% reduction. Carbon pricing exhibits a nonlinear leverage effect with an incentive threshold of 200 RMB per tonne, substantially above China’s current 60–80 RMB per tonne level. This study concludes that while hydrogen–solar–geothermal hybrid systems offer substantial climate benefits, their comprehensive sustainability depends on proactive management of material scarcity costs, precise planning of equipment replacement cycles, and coordinated multi-level policy instruments. The findings provide methodological foundations for transitioning building carbon neutrality assessment from static LCA to dynamic coupling frameworks and from single carbon metrics to integrated carbon-resource-cost evaluations. All quantitative results presented herein are derived from this specific case study under the stated assumptions and parameter values; generalization to other building types or climate zones requires recalibration.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16173390first seen 2026-08-27 05:07:28
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16173390first seen 2026-08-30 05:06:47 · last seen 2026-09-21 04:58:29
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。