Digital inclusive finance and corporate inclusive innovation: empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies
デジタル包摂金融と企業の包摂的イノベーション:中国上場企業からの実証的証拠 (AI 翻訳)
Yunhui Zhao, Ruipeng Zhao, Taiwen Feng, Zhe Sun
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
デジタル包摂金融(DIF)が企業の包摂的イノベーション(CII)に与える影響を、中国A株上場企業のパネルデータを用いて実証分析。社会交換理論に基づき、DIFがCIIを促進するメカニズムと、市場競争や経営者の近視眼性の調整効果を明らかにした。開発途上国への示唆を含む。
English
This paper examines how digital inclusive finance (DIF) influences corporate inclusive innovation (CII) using panel data from Chinese listed companies (2013-2022). Drawing on social exchange theory, it finds that DIF significantly enhances CII by reducing costs and fostering balanced reciprocity. Market competition and managerial myopia negatively moderate this effect. Offers insights for developing economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、地域金融機関のデジタル化と包摂的成長の関係が議論されているが、本稿は中国企業を対象としているため直接的な示唆は限定的。ただし、ESGの社会側面(包摂性)と金融の関係を捉えた点は参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on inclusive finance and sustainable development by providing empirical evidence from China. While not directly about climate, the concept of inclusive innovation relates to the social pillar of ESG, and the findings on the role of digital finance in promoting inclusive growth are relevant for transition economies framing their sustainable finance policies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Useful empirical evidence on the link between digital finance and inclusive innovation, extending social exchange theory.
🏛政策担当者:Provides a case for how digital inclusive finance can foster inclusive innovation, relevant for sustainable development strategies in emerging economies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
This paper aims to explore how digital inclusive finance influences corporate inclusive innovation by filling three key research gaps based on social exchange theory from a micro-organizational perspective. In the current era emphasizes more equitable and sustainable development, the role of inclusive innovation has become increasingly prominent. The research on digital inclusive finance (DIF) by existing scholars has provided certain inspirations for us to understand the role of DIF in corporate inclusive innovation (CII). However, there are still three key gaps in the existing research that need to be filled. To address these gaps, the authors draw on social exchange theory (SET) – a theoretical framework that interprets social interactions through the lenses of rational reciprocity and cost-benefit evaluation – to examine the role of DIF in CII from a micro-organizational perspective. Drawing on panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies (2013–2022), this study uses a fixed effects model to investigate the impact of DIF on CII within the framework of SET. They demonstrate that DIF significantly enhances CII by systematically reducing the economic costs of serving bottom-of-the-pyramid markets and institutionalizing balanced reciprocity norms between firms and stakeholders. They further examine the moderating roles of market competition intensity and managerial myopia, revealing that both variables exert a statistically significant negative moderating effect on the positive relationship between DIF and CII. The potential marginal contributions of this paper are as follows. First, this study enriches the existing academic literature on the interaction between DIF and inclusive development from the micro-level perspective. It takes micro-enterprises as the core analysis unit and delves deeply into the subtle ways in which DIF operates at the micro-organizational level to promote the process of inclusive development. Second, it improves the type spectrum of DIF empowering corporate innovation. It systematically conducts an empirical test for the first time on the direct impact of DIF on CII. Third, it expands the theoretical perspective and optimizes the theoretical explanatory framework by integrating boundary condition analysis. This study innovatively adopts SET as its core analytical framework, focusing on SET 2019's dual paths to dissect the intrinsic logic of DIF 2019s impact on CII. Furthermore, this study introduces market competition intensity and managerial myopia as moderating variables to examine the boundary conditions of the SET-based mechanism, thereby clarifying the scenarios in which DIF exerts a more significant role in promoting CII. Taking China as a case study, it confirms the facilitative effect of DIF on CII, thereby offering actionable insights and practical lessons for other transitional and developing economies in advancing their digital finance initiatives and fostering inclusive growth.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-06-2025-0651first seen 2026-06-22 05:17:01
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。