Evolving roles and shared futures: challenges and visions for Switzerland’s electricity sector transition
進化する役割と共有される未来:スイス電力セクター移行の課題とビジョン (AI 翻訳)
Vanja Djinlev, BinBin J. Pearce, Michael Stauffacher
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
スイス電力セクターの脱炭素化と分散化に伴い、利害関係者間の調整が複雑化している。本研究では、インタビューを通じて、配電系統運用者(DSO)の役割進化に注目し、分散型再生可能エネルギーと地域コミュニティの将来ビジョンを調査。結果、分散型グリッドへの広範な合意がある一方、地域コミュニティの実現性やDSOの負担については見解が分かれた。
English
This study investigates stakeholder visions for Switzerland's electricity transition, focusing on the evolving role of distribution system operators (DSOs). Through interviews, it finds broad consensus on a decentralized renewable grid but divergent views on local energy communities' viability and administrative burden. The research highlights the need for structured dialogue and capacity building to align actors.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の電力システム改革や再生可能エネルギー導入においても、地域コミュニティと配電事業者の役割調整は重要な課題である。本論文の知見は、日本における地域エネルギーコミュニティの推進やDSOの機能強化に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper offers transferable insights for decentralized energy systems worldwide, particularly relevant to European energy community initiatives and DSO evolution under the Clean Energy Package. The emphasis on shared visions and intermediary platforms addresses a critical governance gap in the global energy transition.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on stakeholder coordination in energy transitions, applying socio-technical imaginaries framework to electricity sector.
🏢実務担当者:DSOs and local energy communities can learn about aligning visions and managing administrative complexities in decentralized systems.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for structured dialogue platforms and capacity-building measures to foster shared transition visions.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Abstract Background As energy systems undergo rapid decarbonization and decentralization, coordination between electricity sector actors becomes increasingly complex. In Switzerland, the federal structure, regional diversity, and emerging forms of distributed energy resources and actors present unique challenges for aligning stakeholder roles and responsibilities. This study investigates how stakeholders across the Swiss electricity sector envision the future of the electricity grid, their roles within it, and the coordination mechanisms needed to support the transition, with particular attention to the evolving role of distribution system operators (DSOs). Results Drawing on interviews with stakeholders from across the Swiss electricity sector, the application of the socio-technical imaginaries framework reveals a broad consensus on the aspiration for a highly decentralized and flexible electricity grid with a large share of renewable energy, united by the ultimate goal of national decarbonization while maintaining grid stability. However, diverging visions exist regarding the role of local electricity communities, as some stakeholders are optimistic about their potential for decentralization and public engagement, while others express skepticism regarding their viability, limited financial incentives, and the administrative complexity they impose on DSOs. Conclusions The Swiss electricity sector’s transition is not solely a technical undertaking but also a deeply institutional and social challenge. Coordinating system actors requires attention to differing expectations, governance structures, and resource capabilities. This study highlights the importance of fostering shared visions through structured dialogue, intermediary platforms, and capacity-building measures, especially for local actors and smaller DSOs. While grounded in the Swiss context, the insights are relevant to other decentralized energy systems, particularly considering the ongoing European efforts to support energy communities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-026-00592-wfirst seen 2026-07-20 04:55:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。