市場権限なき市場創設:欧州排出量取引からの事前証拠
Market Creation without Market Authority: Ex-Ante Evidence from European Emissions Trading (原題)
Jan Abrell, Sebastian Rausch
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
EUのETS2による建築物・道路交通への炭素価格拡張を、希少性・交換・配分権限の三機能で分析。交換と配分権限の完成は2028〜2048年の政策コストを25.5%(1.33兆ユーロ)削減し、配分権限が削減分の76%を占める。残余損失の補償は60億ユーロ(ETS2収入の0.2%)で足りる。配分権限の回復は価格を上げつつ政策コストを下げ、ETSの内生的炭素価格は厚生の十分統計量ではないと示す。
English
Analyzes the EU's ETS2 extension of carbon pricing to buildings and road transport through three market functions: scarcity, exchange, and allocation authority. Completing exchange and allocation authority cuts present-value EU policy costs over 2028-2048 by 25.5% (EUR 1.33 trillion); allocation authority drives 76% of savings and 88% of member states benefit. Compensating residual losses costs only EUR 6 billion (0.2% of ETS2 revenues). Restoring allocation authority raises allowance prices yet lowers policy cost, showing the endogenous carbon price is not a sufficient welfare statistic across institutional designs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
EU-ETS2の制度設計評価は、日本での炭素価格制度(GX経済移行債・炭素賦課金)や排出量取引制度の拡張議論に直接示唆を与える。市場の「配分権限」設計が政策コストを大きく左右する点は、日本が制度設計を詰める上で重要な論点。
In the global GX context
Directly informs global carbon-market design debates under TCFD/ISSB-era disclosure and transition finance, showing that institutional allocation authority—not just price signals—determines policy cost. Relevant to any jurisdiction extending ETS coverage to hard-to-abate sectors.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素価格の内生的価格が厚生の十分統計量でないことを示す制度設計研究として重要。
🏢実務担当者:ETS2対象セクターの企業は、価格水準だけでなく配分権限の制度設計がコストに影響する点を注視すべき。
🏛政策担当者:炭素市場の拡張時には交換・配分権限の設計が政策コストを大きく左右することを示す。
📄 Abstract(原文)
By extending carbon pricing to buildings and road transport through ETS2, the European Union is undertaking a major policy experiment in market creation. ETS2 overlaps national emissions budgets and technology requirements, raising a general question: when does a legal market govern allocation? We distinguish three functions of market effectiveness: scarcity, exchange, and allocation authority. Completing exchange and allocation authority lowers present-value EU policy costs over 2028-2048 by 25.5%, or EUR 1.33 trillion relative to legal market creation only. Allocation authority accounts for 76% of savings; 88% of member states benefit. Compensating remaining losses requires EUR 6 billion, only 0.2% of ETS2 revenues. Restoring allocation authority raises the allowance price but lowers policy cost, implying that the endogenous carbon price in an ETS is not a sufficient statistic for welfare across institutional designs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7345425first seen 2026-11-05 04:27:48 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:24:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。