Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence for environmental protection: Scandinavian experience
環境保護のための人工知能の利用に関する法的規制：スカンジナビアの経験 (AI 翻訳)
Arseniy Vladimirovich Svetskiy
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUのAI規制（AI Act）を中心に、スカンジナビア諸国の経験を踏まえて、AIの環境リスク（エネルギー消費、カーボンフットプリント、電子廃棄物）への法的対応を分析。AIのライフサイクル全体にわたる環境影響の評価と、風力発電廃材などの事例から、規制のグリーン化に向けた提言を行う。
English
This paper analyzes legal regulation of AI for environmental protection, focusing on the EU AI Act and Scandinavian experience. It examines environmental risks such as energy consumption, carbon footprint, and e-waste, and proposes recommendations to integrate sustainability into AI regulation, using cases like wind turbine blade disposal.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でもAI規制と環境政策の連携が議論され始めており、本論文のスカンジナビアの実践例は、SSBJやグリーン成長戦略におけるAI活用の枠組み検討に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on regulating AI's environmental impact, complementing the EU AI Act and informing discussions on sustainable digitalization and lifecycle carbon accounting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a legal framework analysis linking AI regulation to environmental risks, useful for scholars studying digital sustainability governance.
🏢実務担当者:May offer insights for corporate legal and sustainability teams on emerging AI-related environmental compliance requirements.
🏛政策担当者:Relevant for regulators considering how to address AI's environmental footprint within existing environmental law and licensing systems.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The article is dedicated to the analysis of legal regulation regarding the application of artificial intelligence for environmental protection purposes in the European Union, with an emphasis on Scandinavian experience. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that AI, on the one hand, is becoming a key tool for environmental policy (monitoring, forecasting, resource management), while on the other hand, it creates a new layer of environmental risks: the increasing energy consumption of digital infrastructure, the growth of carbon footprint, ecosystem degradation, and the accumulation of electronic waste, which remain "green blind spots" in the current regulation. The aim of the article is to identify the extent to which the risk-oriented approach of the AI Act reflects the environmental consequences of the life cycle of AI systems, and how Scandinavian procedures for environmental licensing and impact assessment can be used to "green" AI regulation. The methodological framework of the study consists of general scientific and special legal methods. A systemic legal analysis is applied to identify the interconnections between digital regulation and environmental law, as well as a formal legal method. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the comprehensive reflection on the relationship between artificial intelligence regulation in the EU (AI Act) and the environmental risks arising from the development of wind energy in Scandinavian countries, focusing on issues of electronic waste, carbon footprint, and climate policy. For the first time in domestic doctrine, the Scandinavian experience of integrating norms on sustainable development and digital technologies into environmental regulation is summarized, including the practice of handling spent wind turbine blades and utilizing data from data centers. The author proposes an original approach to the typology of environmental risks associated with generative AI and renewable energy infrastructure and formulates recommendations for adapting the provisions of the AI Act into the Russian legal system, taking into account Scandinavian management models.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2026.7.80857first seen 2026-07-20 05:43:13
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。