Are Sustainable Supply Chains Managing Scope 3 Emissions? A Systematic Literature Review
持続可能なサプライチェーンはScope 3排出量を管理しているか？系統的文献レビュー (AI 翻訳)
Miriam Borchardt, Giancarlo Pereira, Gabriel Milan, Elisabeth Pereira, Leandro Lima, Renata Bianchi, Annibal Scavarda do Carmo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、持続可能なサプライチェーン管理（SSCM）文献におけるScope 3排出量の扱いを系統的にレビューした。61本の論文を分析し、大半が排出量の評価・推定に焦点を当て、次いで報告の議論が多い。企業がネガティブな情報を開示しない傾向や、バリューチェーンの一部のみが協力する課題を指摘。Scope 3管理にはステークホルダー連携とデータ共有が重要と結論づける。
English
This systematic literature review examines how sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) literature addresses Scope 3 emissions. Analyzing 61 papers, it finds most focus on assessment and estimation, followed by reporting. Key challenges include firms withholding negative information and limited stakeholder cooperation across tiers. The study emphasizes the need for focal firm coordination, data sharing, and green product development.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ基準がScope 3開示を求めており、本レビューは実務上の課題（情報非開示傾向や協力不足）を整理。企業のサプライチェーン全体での排出量管理と開示の質向上に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This review directly supports global Scope 3 disclosure efforts under ISSB and CSRD, highlighting persistent challenges in data sharing and stakeholder engagement. It provides a structured overview of academic insights that can inform corporate strategies and regulatory design.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Identifies research gaps in SSCM–Scope 3 integration, offering a taxonomy of themes and future directions.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights common barriers (e.g., tier-1-only cooperation) and practices (metrics, data sharing) for managing Scope 3 emissions.
🏛政策担当者:Provides evidence on non-disclosure of negative information, supporting the case for mandatory Scope 3 reporting rules.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) literature does not directly address Scope 3 emissions despite their role as primary drivers of greenhouse gas emissions. This study aims to provide an overview of the main themes through which the SSCM literature has considered Scope 3 emissions and identify further avenues for research. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted. Scopus and Web of Science were the databases considered. Sixty-one papers were included in the analysis. Most papers focus on assessing and estimating Scope 3 emissions, followed by papers that discuss the reporting of Scope 3 emissions. These papers shed light on how firms may not report Scope 3 emissions if the information is negative to improve investors’ perception of the firm. The last group of papers discusses practices and strategies to manage Scope 3 emissions. The main challenge identified in establishing strategies to manage Scope 3 emissions is engagement with stakeholders, as, generally, only one or two tiers of the value chain cooperate. This study is the first to organize the literature on Scope 3 emissions under the lens of SSCM. If supply chains are to become more sustainable, focal enterprise coordination must be effective and leverage practices such as Scope 3 emissions metrics and measurement, data sharing, and green product development for all stakeholders.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。