移行期世界における海外土地投資：2008年から2026年までの系統的レビュー、炭素中立課題と中国の戦略的経路に焦点を当てて
Overseas Land Investment in a Transitioning World: A Systematic Review from 2008 to 2026 with a Focus on Carbon-Neutrality Challenges and China’s Strategic Pathways (原題)
Yuan Yuan, Yaya Song, Qi Fu, Xiaohan Yu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、海外土地投資に関する2008年から2026年までの文献を体系的にレビューし、炭素中立目標との関連を分析。中国語と英語の研究の乖離を明らかにし、中国の積極的なガバナンス参加への移行、財産権保護、炭素基準の整合、多中心的ガバナンスの重要性を指摘。土地ベース炭素市場の統治に理論的統合と実践的指針を提供する。
English
This systematic review of overseas land investment (2008-2026) examines its role under carbon neutrality targets, revealing divergences between Chinese and English research. It highlights China's transition to active governance, emphasizing property rights, carbon standard alignment, and polycentric governance to balance food security and ecological justice, offering actionable directions for land-based carbon markets.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、海外土地投資と炭素クレジットの関連は、日本の企業が海外で森林・土地関連のカーボンクレジットを活用する際のガバナンス課題に示唆を与える。SSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出削減の観点から、土地由来クレジットの信頼性確保が重要となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to the discourse on land-based carbon markets and governance, relevant to ISSB and CSRD disclosure requirements for nature and carbon credits. It underscores the need for polycentric governance and carbon standard alignment, which are critical for credible carbon accounting and transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive framework for understanding overseas land investment's role in carbon neutrality, highlighting research gaps and governance pathways.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into carbon credit sourcing and governance risks, useful for companies engaging in land-based offset projects.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need for international cooperation and standard alignment in land-based carbon markets, informing policy on carbon neutrality and land governance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Overseas land investment has emerged as one of the most complex human–environment system challenges of the twenty-first century, yet its evolving role under global carbon-neutrality targets remains theoretically under-specified. This study conducts a systematic literature review and bibliometrically assisted analysis of 145 English and 38 Chinese publications (2008–2026) to map the intellectual landscape, identify divergent research priorities, and examine the implications of carbon-credit-based land investment. Our analysis reveals three distinct evolutionary phases, extending from conceptual emergence and mechanism analysis to interdisciplinary expansion. It also identifies three parallel divergences between Chinese- and English-language research: contrasting research stances, thematic priorities, and governance imaginaries. These divergences are rooted in China’s transitional position within a Western-dominated discourse system. The findings suggest that China’s transition from rule adaptation to active governance participation is important, and that priority pathways include property-rights protection, carbon-standard alignment, and polycentric governance frameworks capable of balancing food security, host-country development rights, and global ecological justice. These findings provide both theoretical synthesis and actionable directions for governing land-based carbon markets in an era of geopolitical fragmentation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091578first seen 2026-08-29 04:39:54
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。