← 論文一覧に戻る

スキポール、ヒースロー、フラポートにおける炭素管理と持続可能性パフォーマンス

Carbon Management and Sustainability Performance at Schiphol, Heathrow and Fraport (原題)

Didem Göçmen

Crossrefプレプリント2026-01-01#Scope 3Origin: Global経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: transport
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7158792
原典: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7158792

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、スキポール、ヒースロー、フラポートの3空港を対象に、2023～2025年の炭素管理と持続可能性パフォーマンスを比較分析した。Scope 3排出量は全社で増加し、総排出量は減少しなかった。報告境界やカテゴリ定義の違いが比較を制限することを指摘。

English

This study compares carbon management and sustainability performance of Schiphol, Heathrow, and Fraport airports (2023-2025) using document analysis. Scope 3 emissions increased across all three, offsetting reductions in Scope 1 and 2. Reporting boundary differences limit comparability.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の空港運営会社や関連企業にとって、Scope 3排出量の増加が総排出量削減を阻む構造は示唆的。SSBJ開示やサプライチェーン排出量の管理に応用できる。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on airport carbon management, highlighting the challenge of Scope 3 emissions in value chains. Relevant for global disclosure frameworks like ISSB and CSRD, especially for transport infrastructure sectors.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides comparative case study data on airport carbon management and Scope 3 challenges.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for airport operators and supply chain managers on Scope 3 reporting and reduction strategies.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for standardized reporting boundaries to enable meaningful comparisons.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Airports are increasingly expected to reduce aviation’s environmental impacts while managing energy, operations, transport, supply chains and stakeholder relations in an integrated manner. This study compares the carbon management practices and sustainability performance of Royal Schiphol Group, Heathrow Airport Holdings Limited and Fraport AG during 2023–2025 using document analysis and a comparative multiple-case design. Data from annual reports, sustainability disclosures and carbon-footprint tables were harmonised and assessed alongside reported organisational and operational practices. Scope 3 emissions increased by 10.8% at Schiphol, 3.5% at Heathrow and 0.9% at Fraport, while Heathrow reduced gross Scope 1 emissions by 16.9% and Fraport reduced market-based Scope 2 emissions by 50.9%. Despite improvements in directly managed areas, total carbon footprints did not decline because value-chain emissions increased. Differences in reporting boundaries and category definitions also limit direct performance comparisons. The findings show that airport performa

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。