燃料電池応用の技術経済的実現可能性：評価フレームワークと主要促進要因のレビュー
Techno-economic feasibility of fuel cell applications: A review of assessment frameworks and key enablers (原題)
Jing Wen Chong, Marlia M. Hanafiah
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
2020〜2024年に発表された燃料電池応用の技術経済分析151件をレビューし、統合システム（50%）、運輸（23%）、ハイブリッド再生可能エネルギー（21%）などの応用分野と、LCOE・回収期間・NPCといった経済指標の傾向を整理した。商業化を促す主要因として技術革新、燃料供給、政府政策（炭素価格・補助金等）の3点を特定し、SWOT分析で今後の研究方向を示す。SDG-7・13に整合し、水素経済における市場普及の障壁と促進策を実務者向けに提示する。
English
This review analyzes 151 techno-economic studies (2020–2024) on fuel cell applications, covering integrated systems (50%), transport (23%), and hybrid renewables (21%), and maps economic metrics like LCOE, payback period, and NPC. It identifies three commercialization enablers: technological innovation, fuel supply, and government policy (carbon pricing, subsidies). Aligned with SDG-7 and SDG-13, it offers actionable insights for accelerating fuel cell market adoption.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は水素基本戦略や燃料電池普及をGX政策の柱とするため、コスト低減・政策支援の実証的知見は国内の水素・FC導入判断に有用。ただし開示制度（SSBJ等）との直接接続は弱く、主に技術・政策実務者向け。
In the global GX context
Fuel cells sit at the core of global hydrogen-economy transition finance and decarbonization pathways, yet this review does not engage TCFD/ISSB disclosure frameworks directly. It contributes techno-economic evidence on cost barriers and policy enablers relevant to transition investment decisions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:燃料電池の技術経済評価手法と経済指標の傾向を体系的に把握できる。
🏢実務担当者:水素・FC導入のコスト回収や政策支援依存度を検討する際の参照枠を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:炭素価格・補助金・インセンティブがFC商業化に与える影響を整理する材料となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Fuel cell technology is key in global energy transition within the hydrogen economy, with versatility in applications spanning transportation, industry, and stationary power generation. Nonetheless, high costs remain a significant barrier to widespread adoption, requiring rigorous techno-economic analyses to assess their commercial feasibility. This study reviews 151 techno-economic studies on fuel cell applications published between 2020 and 2024, identifying methodological trends and key enablers for commercialization. The reviewed studies cover diverse applications, including fuel cell-based integrated system, stand-alone fuel cell systems (6%), hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) (21%), and transport-related applications (23%), fuel cell component (1%), with integrated system being the most studied (50%). A variety of identified methodological frameworks are developed to address different purposes, categorized into six groups. The most frequently used economic metrics are LCOE (31%), payback period (12%), and net present cost (NPC) (11%). The analysis highlights three key enablers for improving the economic feasibility of fuel cell applications: (1) Technological innovations, such as system optimization, hybridization, integration, and technical parameter improvements; (2) fuel sources, including hydrogen production, fuelling infrastructure, and alternative fuels; (3) government policy, including carbon pricing, renewable energy incentives, and government subsidies. A SWOT analysis identifies several future research directions, including targeted cost analysis of innovative materials, cost projections, and strategies to reduce reliance on government financial support. Aligned with the objectives of SDG-7 and SDG-13, this review provides actionable insights for stakeholders aiming to overcome economic barriers and accelerate the market adoption of fuel cell applications.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109706first seen 2026-09-24 04:36:30
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。