gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

INTEGRATING GREEN ECONOMY AND FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES TO ADVANCE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

グリーン経済と金融テクノロジーの統合による環境持続可能性の推進 (AI 翻訳)

Sonia Sayari, Nidhal Mgadmi, Majed A Helmi, Hanen Louati, Abdulaziz M Basahel, Hamed Yousef Alshinkity, Sumayya Albalawi

Zenodoプレプリント2026-05-19#気候金融Origin: US
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20294112
原典: https://zenodo.org/records/20294112
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、1990～2024年の米国データを用い、グリーン経済、フィンテック、ガバナンスが環境持続可能性に与える影響を包括的に分析。共和分・誤差修正モデル・分位点ベクトル自己回帰を適用し、再生可能エネルギー拡大や森林保全、グリーン調整GDPが排出削減に寄与する一方、デジタル通貨のエネルギー消費に課題があることを示す。ガバナンスの質が政策整合性を高める調整的役割を果たすと結論。

English

This study examines how green economy, FinTech, and governance affect environmental sustainability in the US (1990-2024) using cointegration, error-correction, and QVAR. Results show renewable energy, forest preservation, and green GDP reduce emissions, while digital currencies have mixed impacts. Governance quality moderates policy alignment. The findings stress strong institutions and green finance incentives.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

本論文は米国データに基づくが、フィンテックを活用したグリーンファイナンスの促進やデジタル通貨の環境影響評価について、日本のグリーン経済政策やSSBJの枠組みにも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper provides empirical evidence on the interplay between green economy, FinTech, and governance in the US, contributing to the global discourse on climate finance and digital sustainability. It underscores the importance of regulatory frameworks to mitigate the negative environmental externalities of digital technologies, relevant for ISSB and transition finance discussions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:This paper offers a robust empirical methodology (cointegration, QVAR) for analyzing the dynamic links between green economy, FinTech, and environmental performance, useful for researchers in climate finance.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can leverage insights on how FinTech expansion can facilitate green finance access, but must be cautious about the energy footprint of digital currencies.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should note the moderating role of governance quality in aligning green economy and FinTech policies, and consider regulations for digital currency energy use.

📄 Abstract（原文）

This study provides a comprehensive examination of how the green economy, financial technologies (FinTech), and governance collectively influence environmental sustainability in the United States over the period 1990–2024. Using descriptive indicators, cointegration methods, error-correction modeling, and quantile vector autoregression (QVAR), complemented by heatmap-based diagnostic analysis, the research captures both long- run equilibrium relationships and short-run adjustment mechanisms. Environmental sustainability is evaluated through the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) in conjunction with greenhouse gas emissions indicators. The results indicate that the expansion of renewable energy, forest preservation, and green-adjusted GDP significantly reduce emissions levels. At the same time, advances in financial technologies (FinTech)— such as digital payment platforms and peer-to-peer lending—broaden access to green finance and improve the efficiency of capital allocation. In contrast, digital currencies exhibit mixed environmental impacts, primarily due to their high energy consumption. Heatmap-based evidence reveals strong transmission channels, where shocks to green-economy or FinTech variables are rapidly reflected in environmental indicators, highlighting substantial structural interdependence. Moreover, governance quality plays a critical moderating role by enhancing policy alignment and strengthening adaptive resilience. Overall, the findings emphasize the need for strong institutional frameworks, well-designed green-finance incentives, and effective regulatory measures to address the environmental externalities associated with energy-intensive digital technologies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。