← 論文一覧に戻る

Solar PV and Nuclear Pathways for Ghana's Energy Transition: A CLEWs++ Analysis

ガーナのエネルギー転換における太陽光PVと原子力の経路:CLEWs++分析 (AI 翻訳)

Ernestina Annan

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)ジャーナル2026-07-23#エネルギー転換Origin: Global対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21515881
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21515881

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、CLEWs++フレームワークとOSeMOSYSを用いて、ガーナの低炭素電力経路を評価した。加速的な太陽光導入シナリオでは、天然ガス発電と排出量をベースライン比12%削減し、コスト増は0.68%に留まる。原子力導入はベースロードの天然ガスを減らすが、投資コストが高い。政策提言として、大規模太陽光の優先と長期的な原子力の補完的活用を推奨する。

English

This study evaluates low-carbon power pathways for Ghana using the CLEWs++ framework and OSeMOSYS. Accelerated solar PV deployment reduces cumulative natural gas generation and emissions by 12% relative to baseline, with only a 0.68% increase in costs. Nuclear power reduces baseload gas but requires higher investment. Policy recommendations prioritize large-scale solar and complementary nuclear in the long term.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、エネルギー転換と電源構成の最適化がGXの重要課題。本分析のCLEWs++手法は、日本の地域エネルギー計画や統合的な資源計画に応用可能。また、途上国での再生可能エネルギー導入政策の知見は、日本の国際協力やJCM案件形成に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This study provides a model-based comparison of solar and nuclear pathways for a developing country's energy transition, relevant to global discussions on just transition and climate finance. The CLEWs++ approach offers a replicable framework for integrated resource planning, useful for countries balancing energy security and decarbonization. It also informs international climate finance and technology transfer debates.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a CLEWs++ modeling framework application for energy transition scenarios, useful for comparative energy systems analysis.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into cost-effective renewable deployment strategies and the role of nuclear as a complement, relevant for energy planning in emerging markets.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of supportive policies for solar PV and long-term nuclear planning to achieve emission reduction targets.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Electricity generation in Ghana relies primarily on thermal energy, particularly natural gas for power production to meet the increasing demand. The dependence on thermal generation has improved energy supply but also increased greenhouse gases emissions. To support Ghana’s energy transition goals, this study assessed alternative low-carbon power production pathways using the Climate, Land, Energy and Water systems Plus (CLEWs++) framework in the Open-Source energy Modelling SYStem (OSeMOSYS) software. Four scenarios were considered: a Baseline representing existing policies, an Accelerated Solar Deployment scenario towards Ghana’s 26 GW of installed solar by 2040, a Restricted Solar Deployment Scenario and a Nuclear Power Development scenario introducing 1 GW of nuclear capacity from 2035 in line with Ghana’s plans. Electricity generation, natural gas utilization, carbon emissions and investment costs were used as indicators to assess the scenarios. The results show that the Accelerated Solar PV deployment scenario without any constraints on annual deployment rate reduces cumulative natural gas electricity generation by 12 % and emissions by 12 % relative to the baseline, with only 0.68% increase in cumulative costs. Restricting the deployment, on the other hand, increased natural gas use and emissions. The nuclear power inclusion reduced natural gas use as baseload, although it required higher cost investment than the Accelerated solar pathway. The study recommends that the Ghanaian Government prioritize large-scale solar PV deployment through supportive renewable energy policies, investment incentives and efficient transmission and grid infrastructure. Additionally, nuclear power should be pursued as a complementary strategy in the long-term to strengthen energy security and reduce emissions.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。