← 論文一覧に戻る

カナダにおける劣化地の回復に向けたアグロフォレストリーの可能性

THE POTENTIAL OF AGROFORESTRY IN THE REHABILITATION OF DEGRADED LANDS IN CANADA (原題)

Munir Dar

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-20#気候科学Origin: JP対象セクター: agriculture
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22864455
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22864455

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、樹木と作物・家畜・生態系修復を組み合わせたアグロフォレストリーが、カナダの多様な生態域における劣化地回復の自然基盤型解決策となり得るかを検討する。メタ分析・現地事例・地理空間モデリングを組み合わせ、土壌有機炭素の向上、侵食抑制、保水力強化、生物多様性増大、気候レジリエンス強化といった効果を示す。カナダの気候公約や先住民の土地管理原則との整合性を指摘し、国家戦略と政策統合の必要性を訴える。

English

This paper examines agroforestry — integrating trees with crops, livestock, and restoration — as a nature-based solution for rehabilitating degraded lands across Canada's ecozones. Using meta-analysis, field case studies, and geospatial modelling, it reports gains in soil organic carbon, erosion control, water retention, biodiversity, and climate resilience. It argues for national implementation strategies and policy integration aligned with Canada's climate commitments and Indigenous stewardship.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

土壌炭素・自然基盤型解決策はSBTiのFLAG(森林・土地・農業)ガイダンスやScope 3の土地利用変化排出と接続する論点であり、食品・林業・農業関連企業の削減目標設定や自然資本開示を検討する日本企業にとって参考になる。ただし日本国内の制度・事例は扱っておらず、直接の政策連動は弱い。

In the global GX context

Nature-based solutions and soil carbon sit at the edge of the disclosure agenda — relevant to SBTi FLAG guidance, land-use change emissions in Scope 3, and emerging nature-related reporting (TNFD). The paper adds a Canadian ecozone perspective but does not engage TCFD/ISSB/CSRD disclosure mechanics directly, so its contribution to global disclosure scholarship is indirect.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:アグロフォレストリーによる土壌炭素・生態系回復の効果量を整理した事例として、自然基盤型解決策の定量評価に関心のある研究者に有用。

🏢実務担当者:食品・農業・林業関連企業がFLAG目標や自然資本・土地利用排出の把握を検討する際の背景知識として参照可能。

🏛政策担当者:劣化地回復と気候目標を結びつける土地利用政策の設計において、自然基盤型解決策の統合根拠として示唆を与える。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Dar, M. (2026). “The Potential of Agroforestry in the Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Forestry Research (CJFR). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22864456, Article DOI: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1445-4176 The Potential of Agroforestry in the Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands in Canada is an advanced scholarly work authored by Munir Dar, M.Sc. (Hons.) Forestry, a forestry specialist and the Publisher & Chief Editor of the Canadian Journal of Forestry Research (CJFR), Toronto, Canada. The study examines how agroforestry, an integrated land‑use system combining trees with crops, livestock, and ecological restoration, can serve as a powerful nature‑based solution for restoring degraded landscapes across Canada’s diverse ecozones. Drawing on the author’s extensive academic and professional background, supported by multiple international scholarly identifiers including ORCID, SSRN, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Web of Science, and Academia.edu, the research provides a rigorous, mixed‑methods analysis involving meta‑analysis, field case studies, and geospatial modelling. The study evaluates the biophysical, ecological, and socio‑economic benefits of agroforestry, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving soil organic carbon (SOC), reducing erosion, enhancing water retention, increasing biodiversity, and strengthening climate resilience. Dar's (2026) work highlights agroforestry’s alignment with Canada’s climate commitments, Indigenous stewardship principles, and sustainable forestry policies. It emphasizes the urgent need for national implementation strategies and policy integration to address land degradation driven by intensive agriculture, deforestation, mining, wildfires, and climate‑induced disturbances. This research contributes significantly to the fields of ecological restoration, sustainable forestry, and climate resilience, offering evidence‑based recommendations for policymakers, land managers, and environmental researchers.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。