← 論文一覧に戻る

石油依存地域における公正移行フレームワークの構築:ガーナ西部地域とニューファンドランド・ラブラドール州からの教訓

Developing just transition frameworks for oil-dependent communities: lessons from the western region of Ghana and the province of Newfoundland and Labrador (原題)

Emmanuel Dompreh

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)ジャーナル2026-10-01#エネルギー転換対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.48336/451
原典: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14783/15695
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

ガーナ西部とカナダ・ニューファンドランド・ラブラドール州の石油依存地域を比較し、エネルギー正義(分配的・手続的・承認的正義)の枠組みで公正移行を分析。石油収入の偏在、先住民参加の排除、文化的承認の欠如、世代間保障の不在という4課題を特定し、参加型予算編成や地域開発基金、共同意思決定の強化を提言する。理論面では構造的承認正義や経済多様化の正義論的位置づけを精緻化する。

English

A comparative study of just transition in oil-dependent Western Ghana and Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, applying energy justice's distributional, procedural, and recognition tenets. It identifies four shared challenges—uneven oil revenue distribution, procedural exclusion of local and Indigenous voices, recognition deficits, and missing intergenerational safeguards—and proposes participatory budgeting, regional development funds, and community co-decision-making. The thesis also refines energy justice theory around structural recognition and economic diversification.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では産炭地域やエネルギー転換地域の公正移行が論点化しつつあり、地域住民参加や世代間衡平の設計はGX推進の社会的受容性を考える上で示唆に富む。SSBJ開示とは直接接続しないが、移行計画の社会的側面の補完材料となる。

In the global GX context

Just transition is increasingly embedded in ISSB/CSRD-adjacent transition planning and transition finance debates, where social safeguards and community consent are scrutinized. This paper offers transferable design principles (participatory budgeting, regional funds) for jurisdictions building just transition frameworks alongside decarbonization disclosure.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:エネルギー正義理論の精緻化と比較事例の実証的知見を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:移行計画における地域・先住民ステークホルダー関与と社会的リスク管理の設計に活用できる。

🏛政策担当者:石油依存地域の公正移行政策において参加型予算や地域基金、世代間衡平の制度化を検討する際の参照枠となる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This study presents a comparative analysis of just transition processes in Western Ghana and Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, with the aim of proposing a justice-oriented framework for managing socio-economic and environmental disruptions associated with global decarbonization. Anchored in the theoretical framework of energy justice, the study applies the three central tenets of distributional, procedural, and recognition justice to assess how benefits and burdens of fossil fuel dependence are allocated, how decisions are made, and whose identities, livelihoods, and knowledge systems are included or excluded in transition planning. Through an in-depth review of policy documents, scholarly literature, and empirical reports from both case study regions, the research identifies four key challenges apparent in both cases: first, the uneven distribution of oil revenues and infrastructural investments, which leaves frontline communities under-resourced despite their exposure to environmental harms; second, procedural exclusions that limit local and Indigenous participation in resource governance; third, persistent recognition deficits that undermine cultural rights and traditional livelihoods; and fourth, the absence of intergenerational safeguards to ensure that the costs of transition are not displaced onto future generations. The research then uses the energy justice framework to propose policy recommendations such as participatory budgeting, regional development funds, and enhanced community co-decision-making. It proposes a just transition framework that responds to the unique vulnerabilities and opportunities of each region, while offering transferable insights for other extractive-dependent economies. Moreover, this thesis reflects critically on the utility of the energy justice framework, proposing theoretical refinements including a clearer articulation of structural recognition justice, greater attention to economic diversification as a justice issue, more rigorous differentiation between participatory inclusion and tokenism, and the integration of intergenerational equity across all dimensions. It also contributes to the evolution of energy justice theory as a practical tool for shaping equitable transitions in different socio-political situations by drawing on the lived experiences and policy gaps in Ghana and NL. It closes by outlining future research and policy development directions focused on sector-specific dynamics, community-led metrics, and long-term monitoring of justice-based transition strategies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。