Barriers, enablers and critical collaborations in the case of Positive Energy Districts
ポジティブ・エネルギー・ディストリクトにおける障壁、促進要因、重要な連携 (AI 翻訳)
Adam Xavier Hearn, Iljana Schubert, Jens Koehrsen, Annika Sohre, Hagar Hamed
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、欧州10カ国のPED関係者へのインタビューに基づき、ポジティブ・エネルギー・ディストリクト（PED）の普及を阻む障壁と促進要因を分析。体制レベルのガバナンス、規制、金融メカニズムが主な障害と特定され、マルチレベル・パースペクティブ（MLP）を用いて解釈。政策提言として、公的資金による都市エネルギー転換プロジェクトへの特定ステークホルダーの参加を義務化・奨励することを提案する。
English
This paper analyzes barriers and enablers to the scaling of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) based on 25 interviews across 10 European countries. Regime-level governance, regulatory, and financial mechanisms are identified as primary hindrances, interpreted through the multi-level perspective (MLP). Policy recommendations include mandating stakeholder participation in publicly funded urban energy transition projects.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の都市部でのエネルギー転換（スマートシティ、地域エネルギー管理）にも示唆を与えるが、欧州特有の規制・資金調達構造に基づく分析であり、直接適用には注意が必要。日本の自治体や都市開発事業者は、ステークホルダー連携の重要性を認識する上で参考となる。
In the global GX context
This research contributes to the global discourse on urban energy transitions by empirically identifying regime-level resistance to scaling innovative district concepts like PEDs. It offers policy-relevant insights for any region aiming to accelerate urban decarbonization through collaborative stakeholder orchestration.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on barriers to PED scaling using MLP, contributing to transition studies literature.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for strategic stakeholder inclusion in urban energy projects to move beyond niche experiments.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests mandating or incentivizing stakeholder participation in publicly funded urban energy projects to overcome regime resistance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) are sometimes portrayed as a key urban energy transition solution, that may aid in meeting the need for rapid decarbonization. However, a European aim of 100 such districts by 2025, has not been achieved, and scaling has been slower than desired. The technical means to create PEDs are available, yet PEDs remain niche experiments. Our research focuses on understanding why this is the case. To this end, this paper undertakes a cross-national analysis of perceived barriers and enablers to PED impact, particularly regarding collaborative dynamics. This analysis is based on 25 semi-structured interviews with PED stakeholders across 10 European countries. This paper shows that without strategic orchestration to include missing stakeholders, PEDs and similar urban energy transition projects may struggle to evolve and achieve systemic impact. Stakeholders identify regime-level governance, regulatory, and financial mechanisms as primary hindrances. Interpreting these results through the lenses of the multi-level perspective (MLP) demonstrates how these perceptions align with documented resistance patterns in transition literature. Policy recommendations to surmount these perceived systemic voids and mitigate regime-level resistance, include mandating or incentivizing specific stakeholder participation in publicly funded urban energy transition projects. Using MLP shows that PEDs are perceived as being hindered by regime-level governance, regulatory and financial mechanisms, and contributes to the academic debate on regime-level resistance to energy transitions. Furthermore, it offers preliminary, perception-based implications for policymakers working in PED creation, development, and replication, pending further empirical validation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2026.1808466first seen 2026-07-24 05:26:25
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。