中国の炭素排出権取引市場と企業のグリーンイノベーション：研究動向、論争、今後の方向性に関する文献レビュー
China's Carbon Emissions Trading Market and Corporate Green Innovation: A Literature Review of Research Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions (原題)
Li Mingliang, Lee Chin, A. S. Abdul Rahim
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、中国の炭素排出権取引（CET）が企業のグリーンイノベーションに与える影響に関する実証研究を体系的に整理する。多くの研究がポーター仮説を支持し、CETが企業のグリーン特許出願を有意に増加させることを示す一方、イノベーションの質（実質的対戦略的）や企業の所有形態による異質性、伝達メカニズムの相対的重要性については論争が残る。今後の研究課題として、イノベーションの質の精緻な測定、デジタルファイナンスの役割、全国統一炭素市場からの新たな証拠を提示する。
English
This review systematically synthesizes empirical studies on the impact of China's carbon emissions trading (CET) on corporate green innovation. Most studies support the Porter Hypothesis, showing CET significantly increases firms' green patent output, but controversies remain regarding innovation quality (substantive vs. strategic), heterogeneity across ownership types, and the relative importance of transmission mechanisms. Future research avenues include fine-grained measurement of innovation quality, the role of digital finance, and evidence from the unified national carbon market.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の炭素市場政策が企業のイノベーションに与える影響を整理したレビューは、日本のカーボンプライシング導入やGXリーグの設計に示唆を与える。特に、政策の効果を評価する際のイノベーションの質の測定や企業の異質性への考慮は、日本の排出量取引制度や省エネ法の運用にも応用可能な視点を提供する。
In the global GX context
This review of China's carbon market and corporate green innovation offers insights for global carbon pricing policy design, particularly regarding the Porter Hypothesis and innovation quality measurement. It highlights the importance of considering firm heterogeneity and transmission mechanisms, which are relevant for jurisdictions implementing or refining emissions trading systems, such as the EU ETS and emerging carbon markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of the literature on carbon pricing and green innovation, identifying research gaps and future directions.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into how carbon pricing policies can drive green innovation, informing corporate strategy in response to regulatory changes.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights evidence on the effectiveness of carbon markets in stimulating green innovation, useful for designing or evaluating carbon pricing mechanisms.
📄 Abstract（原文）
HRMARS - Since China announced its "dual carbon" goals—peaking carbon emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality before 2060—carbon emissions trading (CET) has emerged as one of the country's principal market-based instruments for environmental regulation, and its innovation-inducing effect on firms has drawn sustained scholarly attention. Drawing on empirical studies published in recent years, this paper systematically reviews the research development linking China's carbon market to corporate green innovation. The review shows that the literature has largely converged on the direction of the effect: CET policy generally supports the Porter Hypothesis and significantly raises firms' green patent output. Notable disagreements persist, however, regarding the structure of innovation quality—specifically, the divergence between substantive and strategic innovation—as well as heterogeneity across ownership types and the relative weight of different transmission mechanisms. Building on this synthesis, this paper identifies several underexplored avenues for future research, including the fine-grained measurement of innovation quality, the synergistic role of digital finance, and new evidence from the unified national carbon market, thereby offering a concrete research agenda for subsequent empirical work.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v15-i3/28801first seen 2026-08-24 04:53:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。