← 論文一覧に戻る

ナイジェリア電力部門における再生可能エネルギー統合を加速するための政策・規制枠組み

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks for Accelerating Renewable Energy Integration in Nigeria’s Power Sector (原題)

Abdulhamid Musa

Journal of Technology and Systems📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-26#政策Origin: Global対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.47941/jts.3949
原典: https://doi.org/10.47941/jts.3949
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

ナイジェリアの再エネ導入停滞の要因を、Electricity Act 2023以降の法規・文献の質的レビューで分析。連邦・州の調整不足、系統容量制約、非費用反映型料金などが障壁と指摘。6本柱の準備度フレームワークを提示し、準備度スコアを2.33/6と評価。政策意欲に対し市場実装条件が不十分と結論づける。

English

A qualitative policy review of Nigeria's renewable energy framework after the Electricity Act 2023. It finds weak implementation despite legal progress: fragmented markets, unclear federal-state coordination, limited grid capacity, non-cost-reflective tariffs, and underused smart-grid and storage. A six-pillar readiness framework scores Nigeria 2.33/6, showing ambition outpacing delivery conditions.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

新興国における再エネ市場設計と連邦・州の規制調整の事例として、日本の電力システム改革や地域間連系の議論に示唆を与える。ただし日本固有の制度・企業実務との直接接点は乏しい。

In the global GX context

Adds a Global South regulatory-readiness case to the transition-finance and disclosure literature, complementing TCFD/ISSB work by showing how grid, tariff, and federalism frictions block bankable renewable projects. Useful for investors assessing emerging-market transition risk.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:新興国向けの再エネ移行準備度を測る6本柱フレームワークの適用例として参考になる。

🏢実務担当者:新興国で再エネ事業を検討する際の許認可・系統接続・契約リスクの把握に役立つ。

🏛政策担当者:連邦・州の拘束力ある調整協定や系統・貯蔵基準の義務化など、市場設計の実務的示唆を提供する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Purpose: Nigeria sits on massive renewable potential, yet clean power barely trickles into the national grid. This paper digs into why the transition keeps stalling despite the Electricity Act 2023 handing states the keys to their own power markets. Rather than celebrating the new legal framework, it examines the commercial and technical friction that is blocking developers from connecting to the grid. Methodology: This study used a qualitative policy review to examine Nigeria's renewable energy regulatory framework by reviewing key legal documents alongside relevant academic and industry publications. The selected materials, published mainly between 2023 and 2026, were examined through a structured narrative analysis to identify policy gaps affecting renewable energy policy readiness. Findings: The findings show that Nigeria has made important legal and policy progress, but implementation remains weak. The electricity market is fragmented, and renewable-energy developers continue to face challenges such as unclear federal-state coordination, limited grid capacity and flexibility, non-cost-reflective tariffs, and insufficient use of smart-grid, storage, and circular-economy technologies. The preliminary assessment produced a readiness score of 2.33 out of 6, suggesting that while policy ambition is evident, the conditions needed for effective market delivery are still inadequate. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The six-pillar framework gives researchers a concrete diagnostic for measuring transition readiness beyond checkbox compliance. For industry players, it highlights exactly where projects get stuck between permitting chaos and unbankable contracts. For policymakers, the paper makes the case for binding federal-state coordination treaties, mandatory storage and digital standards, aggressive mini-grid scaling, and placing consumer affordability at the absolute center of market design rather than treating it as an afterthought.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。