‘Energy Justice’? Pastoralism, political ecology and lower-carbon energy transitions
「エネルギー正義」？牧畜、政治生態学、低炭素エネルギー移行 (AI 翻訳)
Caroline Upton, Abdikadir Kurewa, Tungalag Ulambayar, Hussein Wario, Ann Waters‐Bayer
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、牧畜民の土地とコミュニティにおける低炭素エネルギー（LCE）移行の正義の影響を検討する。ケニアとモンゴルの事例研究を用い、Sovacoolの「4Es」枠組みを適用して、囲い込み、排除、侵入、定着のプロセスがエネルギー不正義を生み出すことを示す。非西洋的な場所に基づく正義の意味とFPICの重要性を強調し、地域所有の公正な移行の可能性を探る。
English
This paper examines justice implications of lower-carbon energy transitions in pastoralist lands, using Kenyan and Mongolian case studies. Applying Sovacool's '4Es' framework, it reveals how enclosure, exclusion, encroachment, and entrenchment produce energy injustices. It highlights non-Western, place-based meanings of justice and the importance of FPIC for locally owned, just transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では再生可能エネルギー導入に伴う地域社会との摩擦が課題となっており、本論文の牧畜民の視点は、北海道や沖縄などの地域コミュニティとの合意形成や、SSBJ開示における社会的側面の考慮に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to energy justice scholarship by foregrounding pastoralist communities often overlooked in LCE transitions. It challenges Western-centric EJ principles and informs debates on consent and land rights relevant to international frameworks like FPIC and just transition principles.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a framework for analyzing energy justice in marginalized communities, applicable to other contexts.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need for inclusive stakeholder engagement and FPIC in renewable project development.
🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the importance of land rights and community consent in energy transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
As global renewable energy (RE) capacity continues its unprecedented expansion, green extractivism and energy justice (EJ) have become increasingly pressing concerns, both in critical political ecology-inspired studies and where lower-carbon energy (LCE) infrastructures touch down in particular places and everyday lives. Here we focus on the justice implications of LCE transitions and the processes by which they are produced specifically in pastoralists’ lands and communities. We argue that these remain relatively marginalised in current scholarship, despite pastoral drylands globally becoming targets for roll-out of large-scale LCE, facilitated by intersection of their environmental characteristics and the livelihood strategies, land rights and relations of their occupants, and underpinned by re-emergent discourses of empty, degraded wastelands. The aim of this paper is to enhance critical understanding of EJ in pastoralist communities and through this to advance current debates on EJ principles and meanings and the role of non-Western norms, place and land relations therein. Our two-stage study draws on systematic desk-based analysis of pastoralist case studies globally and on secondary and empirical material from Kenyan and Mongolian case studies. It utilises Sovacool’s (2021) ‘4Es’ framework to examine the subtleties of how enclosure, exclusion, encroachment and entrenchment operate in these contexts, and links these to the production of particular energy-related injustices. We highlight the importance of non-Western, place-based meanings of EJ, grounded in local land relations and of contested concepts of consent, including Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) as critical in refining EJ principles and in shaping prospects for locally owned, just energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104767first seen 2026-08-08 04:48:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。