炭素市場のネクロ法的形態：大気の分離、FPIC、炭素ネクロポリティクス
The necro-legal form of carbon markets: Atmospheric severance, FPIC, and carbon necropolitics (原題)
Rawnak Miraj Ul Azam
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、自主的炭素市場が気候ガバナンスの取引可能な形態へと変容する一方で、法的構造が誰の権利を認識し、誰の利益を犠牲にするかを決定するという緊張を、炭素ネクロポリティクスの概念で考察する。VCS、Gold Standard、ICVCM、パリ協定6.4条の批判的法解釈を通じ、大気の分離、コンプライアンス・ネクロポリティクス、ネクロ法的主体性という3つの概念を提示し、炭素市場の法的形態が手続き的に有効でありながら、地域社会の収用を促進しうることを論じる。
English
This article examines how voluntary carbon market law can facilitate dispossession while remaining formally compliant with climate governance standards. Through critical doctrinal analysis of VCS, Gold Standard, ICVCM, and Article 6.4, it develops concepts of atmospheric severance, compliance necropolitics, and necro-legal subjectivity, arguing these mechanisms render carbon tradeable and resistant to challenge.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではJ-クレジット制度やGXリーグの排出量取引が進む中、炭素市場の法的正義や地域社会との関係は今後の制度設計で重要。本稿の批判的視点は、日本のカーボンクレジット制度の社会的受容性を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
Globally, as voluntary carbon markets face integrity challenges and Article 6 rules evolve, this critical legal analysis highlights risks of dispossession and procedural compliance. It offers a cautionary lens for ISSB-aligned disclosure and transition finance frameworks that rely on carbon credits.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Critical legal scholarship on carbon markets; useful for understanding governance and justice dimensions.
🏢実務担当者:For sustainability teams: awareness of FPIC and community consent risks in carbon credit sourcing.
🏛政策担当者:For regulators: insights into how carbon market rules may enable dispossession despite formal compliance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Voluntary carbon markets promise to transform atmospheric mitigation into a tradeable form of climate governance, yet the legal structures enabling that transformation can also determine whose claims become recognisable and whose interests remain expendable. This article examines that tension through the concept of carbon necropolitics, asking how carbon-market law can facilitate dispossession while remaining formally compliant with climate governance standards. Drawing on critical doctrinal analysis of the Verified Carbon Standard, Gold Standard, ICVCM framework, and Article 6.4 mechanism, the article develops three connected concepts: atmospheric severance, through which sequestration value is detached from territorial authority; compliance necropolitics, through which FPIC procedures can convert structurally constrained participation into legally cognisable consent; and necro-legal subjectivity, through which communities become increasingly difficult to recognise once their carbon productivity is exhausted. The article argues that these mechanisms provide its legal form, rendering it tradeable, procedurally valid, and resistant to challenge.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261483156first seen 2026-09-02 04:54:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。