gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Structural Asymmetries and the Limits of Contemporary Industrial Policy

構造的非対称性と現代産業政策の限界 (AI 翻訳)

Dario Guarascio, Jelena Reljic, Francesco Zezza

ジャーナル2026-05-08#政策Origin: EU
DOI: 10.4324/9781003745563-3
原典: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003745563-3

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、EU加盟国間のエネルギー利用可能性、価格、技術能力、エネルギー集約度、環境持続可能性に関する構造的非対称性を分析する。2022年において、EUの総利用可能エネルギーの60%以上を化石燃料が占め、再生可能エネルギーは18%未満であり、輸入依存度は60%超、一部加盟国では90%超に達する。北部・西部と南部・東部の間で持続的な格差が存在し、EUの政策が国家資源に依存する限り、グリーン移行が既存の格差を拡大するリスクがあると指摘する。

English

This paper maps structural asymmetries across EU member states in energy availability, affordability, technological capacity, energy intensity, and environmental sustainability. In 2022, over 60% of gross available energy came from fossil fuels, renewables only 18%, and import dependency exceeded 60% (over 90% in some states). Persistent divides between northern/western and southern/eastern economies are observed. The paper argues that without EU-level coordination and redistributive mechanisms, the green transition may worsen existing structural divergences.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

EUの事例は、地域間格差が大きい日本においても、グリーン移行が地域間の不均衡を拡大させる可能性を示唆する。日本のGX政策は全国一律のアプローチが多く、本論文のような地域別の構造分析が必要である。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to the global dialogue on just transition by highlighting how the green transition can entrench structural asymmetries without redistributive policies. Its multidimensional framework (energy availability, affordability, tech capacity, etc.) offers a template for assessing regional disparities in other contexts.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a multidimensional framework to analyze structural asymmetries in energy and industrial capacity across regions.

🏛政策担当者:Emphasizes the need for EU-level coordination and redistributive mechanisms to prevent the green transition from widening regional divides.

📄 Abstract（原文）

This chapter maps structural asymmetries across European Union (EU) Member States, drawing on a multidimensional framework encompassing energy availability, energy affordability, technological capacity, energy intensity, and environmental sustainability. The analysis shows that Europe remains strongly dependent on fossil fuels and external suppliers: in 2022, over 60% of its gross available energy derived from oil, gas, and solid fuels. Renewables accounted for only around 18%, while energy import dependency exceeded 60%, reaching over 90% in several Member States. Substantial and persistent asymmetries are observed between a small group of northern and western economies and their southern and eastern counterparts, reflecting long-standing differences in industrial structure, innovation capacity, and fiscal space. The findings highlight the need for a differentiated and territorially sensitive approach to EU energy and industrial policy, one that addresses both immediate risks and long-term capacity gaps. If EU industrial policy continues to rely primarily on national resources, it is likely to reinforce divergence across the Union, as the largest and least-indebted countries are best positioned to benefit from the current framework. Without stronger coordination and redistributive mechanisms at the EU level, the green transition risks exacerbating, rather than reducing, existing structural divides.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。