← 論文一覧に戻る

Beyond the Wind: Mapping Externalities and Their Role in Shaping Willingness To Pay for Wind Energy

風を超えて:外部性のマッピングと風力発電への支払意思額形成における役割 (AI 翻訳)

Gianluigi De Pascale, Luca Esposito, Melania Riefolo, Anna Romagno

Journal of Economic Surveys📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-06#再生可能エネルギーOrigin: EU対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.1111/joes.70135
原典: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70135

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本レビューは、1984年から2025年までの風力発電の外部性と支払意思額(WTP)に関する182の研究を分析。環境便益が顕著な場合にWTPは上昇するが、景観や騒音の負の外部性はWTPを低下させる。手続き的公正や参加が社会的受容性に重要であることを示す。

English

This systematic review of 182 studies (1984-2025) maps wind energy externalities influencing willingness to pay (WTP). Findings show positive externalities (e.g., climate mitigation, jobs) increase WTP, while visual and noise impacts decrease it. Procedural fairness and community participation are key to social acceptance for equitable energy transition.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも洋上風力発電の導入拡大が進む中、地域住民の受容性が課題。本レビューは、環境便益の明確な伝達と計画プロセスへの住民参加の重要性を示唆し、日本の風力発電計画におけるステークホルダーエンゲージメントの設計に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Global wind energy expansion faces local opposition. This review synthesizes evidence that procedural factors and perceived fairness, alongside environmental benefits, shape WTP. Findings support participatory planning approaches critical for equitable energy transitions.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:This review provides a comprehensive map of externalities affecting WTP, useful for designing future empirical studies on social acceptance.

🏢実務担当者:Developers and planners can use these findings to design community engagement strategies that highlight environmental benefits and address visual/noise concerns.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers should integrate procedural fairness and local participation into wind energy siting regulations to enhance acceptance.

📄 Abstract(原文)

ABSTRACT Wind power plays a central role in global low‐carbon energy transitions, offering significant environmental benefits through reduced greenhouse gas emissions and decreased reliance on fossil fuels. Yet, local opposition to wind projects persists, often driven by perceived externalities affecting communities and landscapes. This study conducts a PRISMA‐guided systematic review of literature published between 1984 and 2025 to identify key externalities associated with wind energy and assess their influence on individuals' Willingness To Pay (WTP). A total of 182 relevant studies were included. Findings reveal a broad spectrum of externalities: positive effects such as climate change mitigation, improved energy security, job creation, and local economic gains, and negative impacts including visual intrusion, noise, and wildlife disruptions. Evidence suggests that WTP increases when environmental benefits are salient, while visual and noise impacts substantially lower WTP, especially among locally affected groups. Additionally, social acceptance is strongly shaped by procedural factors, including community participation and perceived fairness in planning processes. Overall, the review underscores the need for context‐sensitive, participatory approaches to wind energy planning to enhance social acceptance and support an equitable transition to sustainable energy systems.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。