系統的レビューによるエネルギー転換と気候脆弱性に関するグローバルな証拠
Global evidence on energy transition and climate vulnerability through systematic review (原題)
Anuj Agrawal, Pushp Kumar, Rouni Sharma
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はPRISMA枠組みに基づきScopus収録の76研究を書誌計量分析し、エネルギー転換と気候脆弱性の関係を扱った既存研究をレビューした。炭素排出削減が環境パフォーマンスの主要指標とされる一方、曝露・感受性・適応能力を含む多次元の脆弱性指標の活用は限定的であることを示す。政策・経済・制度次元の研究が最大のテーマを占め、両概念を統合した分析枠組みの欠如と地方レベル分析の空白を指摘する。
English
This systematic review applies PRISMA and bibliometric analysis to 76 Scopus-indexed studies linking energy transition and climate vulnerability. It finds carbon emission reduction dominates as the environmental performance indicator, while multidimensional vulnerability measures (exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity) remain underused. Four thematic clusters emerge, with policy/economic/institutional dimensions largest, and the literature remains fragmented without a unified analytical framework. Key gaps include sub-national analysis and comprehensive vulnerability indicators.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ・有報開示が気候リスクの多次元評価を求めつつあり、脆弱性指標の統合枠組みの欠如は企業のシナリオ分析設計に示唆を与える。ただし開示制度への直接的な実務接続は弱い。
In the global GX context
For global disclosure scholarship, the review underscores that ISSB/TCFD scenario analysis still lacks standardized multidimensional vulnerability metrics, reinforcing calls for harmonized climate-risk indicators across jurisdictions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー転換と気候脆弱性を統合する分析枠組みの研究ギャップを整理する出発点となる。
🏢実務担当者:気候リスクの多次元指標設計における現行手法の限界を把握する参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:気候脆弱性評価の指標標準化と地方レベル分析の必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Over the last decade, the number of studies showing a link between energy transition and climate vulnerability has increased significantly. Globally, energy transition is an important component of the climate system and plays a key role in economic development. There is a large body of literature on energy transition and climate vulnerability individually, but limited studies have used multiple factors to analyse both. What remains unclear is whether these two systems interact and influence each other. In recent years, especially after 2022, some studies have begun to consider multidimensional measures of climate vulnerability or climate risk, such as composite indices that incorporate exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. The paper aims to critically review the insufficient and highly inconsistent approaches used to establish a relationship between energy transition and climate vulnerability. Data for the study are collected using the Scopus database. This study adopted the PRISMA framework and conducted a bibliometric analysis of 76 studies. This study reviews existing studies on the relationship between energy transition and climate vulnerability, identifies major research themes, and highlights important research gaps for future studies. The review highlights that carbon emission reduction is considered the main indicator of environmental performance, with limited focus on climate vulnerability using multidimensional measures such as exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. The review shows four major thematic areas in the existing literature, with the largest proportion of studies focusing on policy, economic, and institutional dimensions, followed by climate risk and vulnerability, energy transition and environmental outcomes and emerging research areas. The findings also reveal that the literature remains fragmented, with limited integration of energy transition and climate vulnerability within a unified analytical framework. Furthermore, the review identifies significant research gaps, particularly in sub-national analyses and the use of comprehensive climate vulnerability indicators.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04765-7first seen 2026-10-29 04:41:02 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:34:54
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。