Co-Benefits of Carbon Pricing and Electricity Market Liberalization: A CGE Case Study
炭素価格と電力市場自由化の共便益：CGEケーススタディ (AI 翻訳)
Ning Yan, Shenhai Huang, Yan Chen, Daini Zhang, Qin Xu, Xiangyi Yang, Shiyan Wen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、炭素価格と電力市場自由化が中国の持続可能なエネルギー移行に与える影響をCGEモデルで分析。電力自由化により炭素価格の効率性が向上し、GDPが0.06%増加、排出削減コストが12%削減される一方、電力価格上昇が農村・低所得世帯に不均衡な影響を与えることを示した。
English
This study uses a dynamic CGE model to analyze how carbon pricing and electricity market liberalization jointly affect China's sustainable energy transition. Results show liberalization enhances carbon pricing efficiency, increasing GDP by 0.06% and reducing abatement costs by 12%, but raises electricity prices disproportionately affecting rural and low-income households.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の事例だが、日本でも炭素価格導入と電力市場改革の連携は重要。SSBJやGXリーグでの政策設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
While focused on China, the study offers insights for global carbon pricing design, particularly the trade-off between efficiency and equity in electricity market liberalization, relevant for just transition discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CGEモデルを用いた炭素価格と電力自由化の相互作用分析の手法を参考にできる。
🏢実務担当者:炭素価格導入時の電力市場設計や社会的影響への配慮が必要であることを示唆。
🏛政策担当者:排出削減と社会的公平性のバランスを取る政策設計の重要性を認識すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study explores how carbon pricing and electricity market liberalization jointly contribute to China’s sustainable energy transition. Using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model (CEEEA2.0), we simulate three policy scenarios—business as usual, emissions trading scheme (ETS) with regulated electricity prices, and ETS with market-based pricing—under a unified emissions cap. The results demonstrate that electricity market liberalization enhances carbon pricing efficiency by eliminating price distortions, leading to a 0.06% increase in GDP and a 12% reduction in emission abatement costs. However, liberalization also raises electricity and consumer prices, disproportionately affecting rural and low-income households. These findings underscore the need to balance economic efficiency and social equity in sustainability-oriented energy reforms. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of designing inclusive and just transition policies to ensure that carbon mitigation efforts support long-term environmental, economic, and social sustainability goals.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135992first seen 2026-05-05 19:06:42
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。