A Study on the Internal Logic, Major Practices, and Long-Term Mechanisms of Green Finance Development
グリーンファイナンス発展の内部論理、主要実践、および長期的メカニズムに関する研究 (AI 翻訳)
Yubo Zhang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、グリーンファイナンスの内部論理と実践を分析し、政策、規制、市場商品（グリーンボンド、カーボン市場）の現状と課題を整理。スタンダードの不統一、グリーンウォッシュのリスクを指摘し、長期的なメカニズムとして、規制強化、市場活性化、技術革新、国際的調和の必要性を提言する。
English
This paper examines the internal logic and major practices of green finance, covering policy, regulation, green bonds, and carbon markets. It identifies challenges such as inconsistent standards and greenwashing, and proposes four long-term mechanisms: stronger rules, market vibrancy, tech-driven innovation, and global alignment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国のグリーンファイナンス発展の分析は、日本の金融機関や政策立案者にとって、アジア全体の動向を理解する一助となる。特に、スタンダードの統一やグリーンウォッシュ対策は、日本のSSBJや有報記述との比較検討に有用。
In the global GX context
As ISSB and CSRD push for standardized disclosure and transition finance frameworks, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of green finance mechanisms from a Chinese perspective, relevant for global policymakers and practitioners navigating alignment and greenwashing risks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive overview of green finance mechanisms and challenges, useful for theoretical framing.
🏢実務担当者:Offers practical insights for corporate sustainability teams on the evolving green finance landscape, including risks like greenwashing.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for consistent standards and international alignment, valuable for regulators designing green finance policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change keeps piling on pressure, and resources are getting tighter. Green finance has moved to the front line as the main lever for pushing the world economy onto a low-carbon, sustainable track. Its day-to-day work now covers policy, regulation, new products, reward schemes, standard setting, and cross-border teamwork. Governments draw up national plans and laws; markets roll out green bonds, sustainability-linked loans, and carbon markets. The idea is simple: turn outside environmental costs into inside costs, back national green goals, and stay in step with global talks. Money then flows where it should, risks get cushioned, and signals nudge industry to clean up its act. Still, standards stay patchy, incentives feel thin, most products look alike, and greenwashing lurks. A lasting setup needs four things moving at once. First, firmer rules and clearer disclosure. Second, bigger and livelier markets, with tax breaks that actually work. Third, tech-driven ideas that reach beyond copy-paste deals. Fourth, closer alignment on global norms. If these gears mesh, green finance can shift from chasing sheer size to delivering real quality, keeping the money tap open for an economy-wide green switch.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.ld33201first seen 2026-05-14 23:26:45
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。