gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Enhancing Green Bond Regulation in the EU: Strengthening Oversight, Market Growth, and Climate Justice

EUにおけるグリーンボンド規制の強化:監視強化、市場成長、気候正義 (AI 翻訳)

Treglia, Chiara

プレプリント2026-04-02#トランジション・ファイナンスOrigin: EU
DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/871
原典: https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/871

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文はEUのグリーンボンド規制(EUGB規則)を批判的に検討し、自主的な枠組みやEUタクソノミーの解釈上の曖昧さが普及を妨げる可能性を指摘する。また、ESMA、ECB、EIBの技術的・助言的役割を提案し、気候正義の統合を提唱する。

English

This paper critically examines the EU Green Bond Regulation (EUGB), highlighting voluntary commitments and Taxonomy ambiguities as barriers. It proposes enhanced oversight roles for ESMA, ECB, EIB, and integration of climate justice to boost market confidence and equity.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

EUGB規則は日本のグリーンボンドガイドラインやSSBJの動向と比較する上で重要。自主的な枠組みの限界と気候正義の視点は、日本のGX実践にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper offers critical analysis of the EUGB Regulation, relevant for global transition finance and green bond standards. Its proposals for oversight and climate justice align with ISSB and CSRD discussions on social factors.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Scholars gain a nuanced critique of the EUGB Regulation and its interplay with the EU Taxonomy, plus proposals for institutional roles.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can understand regulatory barriers and incentives for issuing EU Green Bonds under the EUGB framework.

🏛政策担当者:Regulators can note the suggested oversight enhancements by ESMA/ECB/EIB and the call for climate justice integration to strengthen green bond markets.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Green bonds are a critical tool for financing sustainable projects, yet their effectiveness depends on robust regulatory frameworks. The European Union (EU) has taken a significant step with the European Green Bond Regulation (EUGB Regulation), aiming to enhance transparency, combat greenwashing, and align green bonds with the EU Taxonomy. However, the voluntary nature of the commitments enshrined in the EUGB Regulation, along with the interpretational ambiguities linked to the EU Taxonomy, may hinder adoption and market impact. This paper critically examines the EUGB Regulation, assessing its potential and limitations. It first explores the regulatory context surrounding the EU green bond market, highlighting the fragmented framework preceding the EUGB Regulation. It subsequently identifies potential barriers to the EUGB Regulation’s adoption by issuers. To strengthen oversight, the study proposes a complementary technical and advisory role for the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the European Central Bank (ECB), and the European Investment Bank (EIB), leveraging their expertise to enhance enforcement and market confidence. Furthermore, the paper advocates integrating climate justice into the regulatory framework. A fair burden-sharing mechanism among Member States could ensure equitable green finance distribution, aligning the EUGB Regulation with the EU’s Just Transition Mechanism. The contribution concludes that while the EUGB Regulation represents progress, refinements - including financial incentives and stronger enforcement - are necessary to maximize its impact. Strengthening oversight and incorporating social equity considerations could transform the regulation into a key driver of both market efficiency and climate justice in the EU’s green transition.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。