炭素のためのブロックチェーン——技術は除去の信頼を確保できるか？
Blockchain for Carbon Can Tech Ensure Trust in Removals? (原題)
Kiran Sahar, Junaid Zakria, Khawar Sultan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
自主的炭素市場が抱える信用危機——クレジット品質、透明性、二重計上の問題——に対し、ブロックチェーンの不変性・透明性・スマートコントラクトによる自動化が解決策となり得ると論じる。発行から償却までの追跡、トークン化による流動性向上、パリ協定第6条のITMO二重計上防止までを射程に入れる。ただし信頼確保には高品質な方法論、デジタルMRV統合、相互運用性基準、包摂的ガバナンスが前提だと結論づける。
English
The voluntary carbon market faces a crisis of confidence over credit quality, transparency and double-counting. This chapter argues blockchain's immutability, transparency and smart-contract automation can rebuild trust across issuance, retirement, tokenization and Article 6 ITMO tracking. It concludes trust is achievable only with high-quality methodologies, digital MRV integration, interoperability standards and inclusive governance.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではJ-クレジットやGXリーグ、SSBJ開示と炭素クレジット調達の整合が課題。デジタルMRVや二重計上防止の設計は、国内クレジット制度と国際ITMO移転の信頼性担保に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As ISSB, CSRD and Article 6 rules tighten, credible tracking of carbon credits and removals becomes a disclosure-integrity issue. The chapter maps how blockchain-based registries and digital MRV could complement TCFD/ISSB reporting and transition-finance integrity.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素市場インフラとデジタルMRVの設計論点を、ブロックチェーン特性と制度要件の接合として整理する視点を提供。
🏢実務担当者:クレジット調達・償却の透明性確保や二重計上リスク管理に、トークン化・自動化の実務的選択肢を示す。
🏛政策担当者:J-クレジットやITMO移転制度のデジタル化・相互運用性基準の検討材料になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The voluntary carbon market is in a root cause crisis of confidence which has been marred with high-profile failures regarding the quality of credit, transparency and double-counting. These structural problems of opaque tracking, ineffective verification and fragmented registries can jeopardize the role of the market in funding the necessary carbon dioxide removal. This chapter explores how blockchain technology can act as the root solution to this lack of trust. It contends that the three principal capabilities of blockchain, as immutability, transparency and automation through smart contracts, can provide a formidable working kit to transform the carbon market infrastructure. Technology is said to be revolutionary in terms of traceability, beginning with issuance, all the way through retirement, automated exchanges, liquidity improvement through tokenization, and strong controls to eliminate any form of double counting especially of the Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The chapter concludes through case studies and architectural analysis that yes, blockchain can provide trust, but only through an overall system that is focused on high quality methodologies, integration of digital MRV, setting standards of interoperability and development of inclusive governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003767848-15first seen 2026-10-14 05:09:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。