Energy Justice, Sustainability, and Local Climate Action Planning: A Case Study from Türkiye
エネルギー正義、持続可能性、地域気候アクション計画：トルコの事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
Ayşe Özcan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
トルコ6大都市の気候行動計画をエネルギー正義の観点で評価。エネルギー正義指数（EJI）平均30.2点、技術官僚的ギャップ15.7点、脆弱層モニタリングは全都市で欠如。手続的公正が最弱で、権利ベースのガバナンスを提案。
English
This study assesses energy justice in local climate action plans across six Turkish coastal municipalities. Using a mixed-methods design with an Energy Justice Index (EJI), it finds a low mean EJI score (30.2/100), a Technocracy Gap of 15.7, and no monitoring mechanisms for vulnerable groups. Procedural justice is weakest, and a rights-based governance approach is proposed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の自治体の気候変動対策計画（実行計画）や脱炭素先行地域の評価にも示唆。技術目標偏重を点検し、脆弱層への配慮や手続的公正の指標（EJI）を組み込む枠組みとして参照できる。
In the global GX context
This contributes to global energy justice scholarship with a replicable municipal-level framework and a new Technocracy Gap indicator, relevant for just-transition and local climate governance debates beyond Türkiye.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a municipal-level Energy Justice Index framework and Technocracy Gap indicator for assessing local climate planning.
🏢実務担当者:Local governments can use the EJI framework to self-assess inclusion of justice provisions in climate action plans.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights gaps in procedural and recognition justice in municipal climate plans, suggesting rights-based governance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study examines the extent to which energy justice principles are incorporated into local climate governance across six Turkish coastal metropolitan municipalities: Istanbul, Bursa, Kocaeli, Izmir, Antalya, and Trabzon. Using a mixed-methods design that combines qualitative policy analysis with a purpose-built Energy Justice Index (EJI), the study evaluates distributive, procedural, and recognition justice provisions within Climate Action Plans (CAPs) and Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs). The findings indicate that local climate planning in Türkiye remains predominantly focused on technical and emissions-oriented objectives, offering comparatively limited attention to democratic participation and the needs of vulnerable populations. Quantitatively, the municipalities exhibit a low mean EJI score of 30.2 out of 100 and a mean Technocracy Gap of 15.7 points, alongside a universal absence of monitoring mechanisms for vulnerable groups (R3 = 0 across all cases). Procedural justice emerged as the weakest dimension, while recognition justice was frequently limited to identifying vulnerable groups without corresponding monitoring. The study contributes to energy justice scholarship by developing a municipal-level assessment framework and introducing the Technocracy Gap as an exploratory indicator of the balance between technical climate ambition and justice-oriented governance provisions. It further proposes a rights-based governance approach for more just local climate planning.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147006first seen 2026-07-31 05:17:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。