Identifying Barriers to Municipal Climate Neutrality: Case Study of Latvia
地方自治体の気候中立性に対する障壁の特定:ラトビアの事例研究 (AI 翻訳)
Paula Veinberga, Zane Pīpkalēja, Aiga Barisa, Jūlija Gušča
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ラトビアの地方自治体を対象に、気候中立性達成に向けた障壁を調査した。質問票調査の結果、自治体の規模や能力によって障壁の重要性が異なることが明らかになった。主な障壁としては、資金不足、政治的優先順位の低さ、専門知識の欠如などが挙げられる。
English
This study identifies barriers to achieving climate neutrality in Latvian municipalities through a survey. Results show that barriers differ by municipality size and capacity, with key obstacles including lack of funding, low political priority, and insufficient expertise.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも自治体の脱炭素化が進む中、本稿が示す政策・実務上の障壁は参考になる。特に、自治体間の能力差が気候対策推進に影響する点は、日本の地域特性を考慮した支援策の設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global understanding of local-level barriers to climate neutrality. It highlights how capacity and size affect implementation, relevant for EU and other regions designing municipal support programs.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on barriers to municipal climate action, useful for comparative studies on local climate governance.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights key barriers that municipalities face, offering a checklist for local governments to evaluate their own challenges.
🏛政策担当者:Shows the need for tailored support to smaller municipalities with limited capacity, informing national and EU policy design.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Local governments play a key role in achieving climate neutrality goals, as the local level is where measures are implemented in the areas of energy management, mobility, territorial development and public services, which directly affect greenhouse gas emissions. The competence of local governments is broad, and although the impact of climate change is evident and the integration of climate goals into regulatory framework is increasing, the prioritization of these topics is not always prominent on the agenda of local governments. However, local government action in the field of emission reduction is often limited by various structural, institutional and practical barriers, the significance and impact of which can vary significantly depending on the local context. This study focuses on the experiences and perspectives of Latvian municipalities on the barriers to achieving climate neutrality, based on the results of a survey of municipalities. The survey serves as the main empirical basis for identifying barriers, assessing their significance and comparing them. The responses provided by municipal representatives allow us to assess which barriers most hinder the implementation of emission reduction measures in practice, as well as to reveal differences between municipalities of different sizes and capacities. The survey results are analyzed in conjunction with existing research on energy management and climate policy implementation in European municipalities, thus providing both an empirical and analytical perspective on the problem. The analytical approach has resulted in conclusions and practical recommendations based on the real needs of local governments, aimed at more effective emission reduction and achieving climate neutrality goals at the local level. The broad scope and mutual influence of barriers shows that transition to climate neutrality is an interdisciplinary issue, in which local governments must be able to apply an integrated approach. At the same time, the results of the study highlight different and divergent experiences of how climate issues are prioritized in local governments, both at the political and management levels – often the prioritization of climate issues among other issues within the competence of a local government is related to the capacity, size and financial capabilities of the local government.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.7250/conect.2026.096first seen 2026-05-31 04:32:22 · last seen 2026-06-03 04:44:12
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。