中国におけるエネルギー政策とエネルギー管理：構造転換のガバナンス論理と今後の経路
Energy Policy and Energy Management in China: Governance Logic and Future Pathways of Structural Transformation (原題)
haixin Huang, Haowei Qie, Runyi Du, Feng Liu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国のエネルギー政策が規模拡大からシステム再構築へ移行する過程を、政策進化・管理課題・制度改革の3次元で分析。第14次五カ年計画では再エネが設備容量の約6割を占め、エネルギー法が施行。第15次計画では非化石エネルギーを一次消費の25%、発電の50%とする拘束目標を設定し、エネルギー消費の二重規制から炭素排出の二重規制へ移行する。ガバナンス能力の近代化が転換の成否を決めると論じる。
English
This paper analyzes China's energy governance transition from scale expansion to systemic restructuring across policy evolution, management challenges, and institutional reform. Renewables reached ~60% of installed capacity in the 14th FYP, and the 15th FYP sets binding targets of 25% non-fossil primary energy and 50% non-fossil generation, shifting from dual control on energy to dual control on carbon. It argues governance capacity modernization, not capacity metrics, determines success.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の炭素二重規制への移行やエネルギー法施行は、日本のSSBJ・GX推進政策を考える上で比較対象となる。アジア最大の排出国の制度設計は日本企業のサプライチェーン・Scope3対応にも影響する。
In the global GX context
China's shift to dual carbon control and its Energy Law offer a key comparative case for global disclosure scholarship, illustrating how the world's largest emitter institutionalizes decarbonization targets—relevant to ISSB/TCFD alignment and supply-chain Scope 3 exposure for multinationals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:中国のエネルギーガバナンス移行を制度・政策の観点から整理した比較研究の枠組みとして活用できる。
🏢実務担当者:中国拠点・調達を持つ企業は、炭素二重規制や再エネ統合の政策動向をサプライチェーン・コンプライアンス計画に反映すべき。
🏛政策担当者:炭素二重規制への移行設計や再エネ統合の制度的ボトルネックは、他国の政策立案の参照事例になる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
China’s energy policy and management are transitioning from scale expansion to systemic restructuring. During the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021–2025), renewables accounted for approximately 60% of installed capacity, and the Energy Law took effect. Entering the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026–2030), binding targets require non-fossil energy to reach 25% of primary consumption and 50% of electricity generation. Meanwhile, the management system is shifting from dual control over energy consumption to dual control over carbon emissions. This paper examines China’s energy governance transition across three dimensions: policy evolution, management challenges, and institutional restructuring. In terms of policy, the 14th Five-Year Plan saw accelerated green transition, while the 15th centers on carbon peaking, shifting from scale to structure-orientation, and from policy-driven to rule-of-law-based governance. In terms of management, four challenges emerge, including tensions among security, low-carbon, and economic objectives, bottlenecks in new energy integration, social costs of transitioning traditional energy roles, and governance hurdles in digital transformation, revealing structural barriers to policy implementation. In terms of institutional restructuring, rule of law, marketization, and systematization are advancing in parallel, shaping the institutional framework for governance modernization. Looking ahead, computing-energy coupling, zero-carbon industrial park experiments, and international governance dimensions are emerging as frontier issues. This paper argues that China’s energy transition is not merely technological or industrial, but a fundamental shift in governance logic. The modernization of governance capacity, rather than unidimensional gains in installed capacity or technical metrics, determines the transition’s success. The deep shift from scale expansion to systemic restructuring, and from administrative dominance to institutional governance, will shape the future of China’s energy development.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/en19204891first seen 2026-10-17 04:49:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。