Forests as Living Public Infrastructure: Evidence Requirements for Mediterranean Wildfire Risk Governance, Restoration and Carbon Accounting
生きた公共インフラとしての森林：地中海性 wildfire リスクガバナンス、回復、炭素会計のためのエビデンス要件 (AI 翻訳)
E. Milios, Kyriaki Kitikidou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、気候変動と山火事を統合的に捉え、地中海地域の山火事リスクガバナンス、森林回復、バイオマス利用、炭素会計、公共調達を結ぶエビデンス要件を整理する。ギリシャを事例に、燃料連続性の未管理やCO2e主張の信頼性欠如など、政策上の近道を批判し、リスク診断から監査までの共通エビデンス連鎖を提案する。
English
This review integrates climate change and wildfire governance, focusing on Mediterranean fire-prone landscapes. It synthesizes evidence requirements linking risk governance, restoration, biomass use, carbon accounting, and public procurement, using Greece as a case. It critiques shortcuts like unmaintained fuel continuity and unverified CO2e claims, proposing a common evidence chain from risk diagnosis to public audit.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、森林吸収源のカーボンクレジット（J-クレジット）や自治体の森林管理が注目される中、本稿の「エビデンス連鎖」の考え方は、森林炭素会計の信頼性向上や、公共調達における環境主張の検証に示唆を与える。ただし、地中海特有の火災リスクは日本にそのまま当てはまらないため、方法論の応用が中心となる。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper contributes to the growing literature on nature-based solutions and carbon accounting integrity, aligning with ISSB and CSRD disclosure requirements for credible climate claims. It offers a framework for verifying restoration and carbon claims, relevant for transition finance and green procurement. The emphasis on public audit and evidence chains is timely for regulators and standard-setters.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a framework for integrating wildfire risk and carbon accounting evidence, useful for designing robust monitoring and verification systems.
🏢実務担当者:Offers guidance on credible carbon claims and restoration practices, relevant for sustainability reporting and procurement.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for evidence-based governance and audit mechanisms in forest and climate policy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change and wildfire are often treated as separate policy problems, although their costs and ecological consequences converge in fire-prone landscapes. This critical integrative review examines the evidence requirements that connect Mediterranean wildfire-risk governance, restoration, biomass use, carbon accounting, ecosystem services, public procurement and professional capacity. A purposive, theme-based synthesis combines peer-reviewed research, international standards, European Union assessments and audit reports, and Greek implementation documents; Greece is used as a policy case within a wider Mediterranean evidence base. Building on the living- and green-infrastructure literature, this review treats forests as living public infrastructure: dynamic systems whose public functions depend on maintenance, ecological limits and repeated verification. It distinguishes evidence synthesis from policy recommendation and evaluates recurrent shortcuts such as unmaintained fuel continuity, tree planting without diagnosis, carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) claims without credible baselines or permanence strategies, and monitoring platforms without field validation. The resulting framework links risk diagnosis, prioritised intervention, field measurement, integrity gates and public audit. Its scientific contribution is to specify a common evidence chain through which prevention, restoration and climate claims can be compared and tested rather than accepted as activity counts or communication outputs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.3390/sci8080192first seen 2026-08-08 05:37:08
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。