gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Climate Change as a Non-Traditional Security Threat: Rethinking Global Security Paradigms.

非伝統的安全保障脅威としての気候変動:グローバル安全保障パラダイムの再考 (AI 翻訳)

Swati Chongder

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-04-06#気候科学Origin: Global
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19437525
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19437525

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

気候変動を非伝統的安全保障脅威と位置づけ、従来の軍事中心の安全保障パラダイムでは不十分であると論じる。チャド、シリア、イラク、米国などの事例から、異常気象が食料・水・健康・生計を破壊し、避難民や社会不安を引き起こす実態を示す。アルク氷融解や中東の気候紛争など、環境変化と地政学的緊張の連鎖を指摘し、気候正義と安全保障の接続を強調する。

English

This paper reframes climate change as a non-traditional security threat, arguing that traditional military-focused security paradigms are inadequate. Using cases from Chad, Syria, Iraq, and the US, it shows how extreme weather disrupts food, water, health, and livelihoods, leading to displacement and unrest. It highlights the convergence of environmental change with geopolitical tensions, such as Arctic ice melt and climate-sensitive conflicts in the Middle East, and stresses the link between climate injustice and global security.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX政策では、気候変動を安全保障問題として捉える視点はまだ限定的だが、エネルギー安全保障や防災の文脈で今後重要性が増す可能性がある。本稿は概念整理として参考になるが、具体的な開示や実務への応用は乏しい。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to the global discourse on climate security, aligning with frameworks like the World Economic Forum's global risks report. It provides a broad conceptual overview but lacks specific policy or disclosure implications for GX practitioners.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:気候安全保障の概念整理として有用だが、GX実証研究への直接的な示唆は限られる。

🏛政策担当者:気候変動を安全保障政策に統合する必要性を認識するための参考資料となる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Climate change has transitioned from being primarily an environmental issue to a significant non-traditional security threat, with extensive implications for human welfare, economic stability, and geopolitical dynamics. Traditional security paradigms, which concentrate on military threats and the sovereignty of states, are increasingly insufficient in tackling dangers that stem from extreme weather phenomena, resource shortages, and ecological decline. Evidence from areas such as Chad, Syria, Iraq, and the United States illustrates that droughts, floods, heatwaves, and storms disrupt food systems, water resources, health services, and livelihoods, resulting in displacement, social unrest, and increased vulnerability. On a global scale, the melting of Arctic ice and the competition for strategic resources, along with climate-sensitive conflicts in the Middle East, highlight the convergence of environmental change with geopolitical tensions and militarization. Moreover, contemporary warfare and energy dependencies intensify the impacts of climate change, creating feedback loops that further destabilize regions. Disparities in climate resilience, especially in developing countries, underscore the dangers posed by cuts in climate assistance and unequal adaptive capacities, emphasizing the connection between climate injustice and global security. The 2025 U.S. Threat Assessment, along with reports from the World Economic Forum and the World Meteorological Organization, indicates that environmental threats are now among the most urgent long-term global risks, underscoring the need to incorporate human security into policy frameworks. This paper contends that effective responses to climate change necessitate comprehensive strategies that integrate disaster preparedness, transitions to renewable energy, humanitarian aid, and international cooperation. Acknowledging climate change as a core security issue is crucial for mitigating cascading risks, protecting vulnerable populations, and fostering a resilient, equitable, and stable global order

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。