南東ナイジェリアの温暖湿潤気候における建築物への気候設計戦略（BDS）統合の課題：批判的レビュー
Challenges in the Integration of Bioclimatic Design Strategies (BDS) in Buildings in the Warm-humid Climate of South-East Nigeria: A Critical Review (原題)
Chidimma Berne Okoye
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、南東ナイジェリアの温暖湿潤気候における建築物への気候設計戦略（BDS）統合を妨げる課題を系統的文献レビューで分析した。技術的専門知識の不足、経済的制約、標準化指標の欠如、規制執行の弱さなど10の主要障壁を特定し、規制改革・財政インセンティブ・能力構築・在来材料活用を含む多角的戦略を提言する。サハラ以南アフリカの気候対応型・省エネ建築への移行に資する障壁フレームワークを提示する。
English
This systematic literature review examines barriers to integrating bioclimatic design strategies (BDS) in buildings in South-East Nigeria's warm-humid climate. It identifies ten major challenges spanning technical, economic, regulatory, and cultural domains, including weak enforcement, high upfront costs, and lack of standardized metrics. The study proposes a multi-pronged strategy of regulatory reform, financial incentives, capacity building, and indigenous materials to advance climate-responsive, energy-efficient architecture in sub-Saharan Africa.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本とは気候・制度文脈が異なるが、省エネ建築の普及障壁（技術者不足・初期コスト・規制執行）は日本のZEH・省エネ改修政策の議論にも示唆を与える。特に建築性能ギャップや標準化指標の欠如は、国内の非住宅建築の環境性能表示制度を考える上で参照価値がある。
In the global GX context
While focused on sub-Saharan Africa, this review's barrier framework—spanning technical capacity, upfront cost, regulatory enforcement, and performance gaps—parallels challenges in global building decarbonization under frameworks like CRREM and EU EPBD. It adds a developing-region perspective often missing from TCFD/ISSB-aligned real-estate transition scholarship, highlighting how institutional and financial enablers shape building-sector climate action.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:建築の気候設計普及障壁を体系的に整理したフレームワークは、途上国・温暖湿潤地域の省エネ建築研究の比較分析に有用。
🏢実務担当者:初期コスト・技術者不足・規制執行の弱さなど、省エネ建築導入時の実務的障壁の把握に役立つ。
🏛政策担当者:建築省エネ普及には規制執行強化・財政インセンティブ・能力構築の組み合わせが不可欠であることを示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climatic design strategies (BDS) offer a viable pathway for reducing energy demand and enhancing thermal comfort in buildings, particularly in warm-humid climates. However, their integration into mainstream architectural practice remains limited in many developing regions. This study critically reviews the challenges that impede effective integration of BDS in buildings within the warm-humid climate of South-East Nigeria and proposes evidence-based pathways for wider adoption. A systematic literature review (SLR) methodology was employed, drawing from peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, policy documents, and technical reports published between 2000 and 2026. The review identifies ten major challenges: lack of technical expertise among design professionals; economic constraints and high upfront costs; limited availability of sustainable materials; absence of standardized integration metrics and frameworks; weak institutional and regulatory enforcement; climate dependence complicated by climate change uncertainty; socio-cultural preferences for mechanical cooling; persistent performance gaps between predicted and actual building performance; lack of financial incentives; and spatial constraints from rapid urbanization. Findings reveal that while awareness of BDS exists among building professionals in South-East Nigeria, implementation remains fragmented due to systemic barriers spanning technical, economic, regulatory, and cultural domains. The study concludes that overcoming these challenges requires a multi-pronged strategy encompassing regulatory reform, financial incentives, capacity building, promotion of indigenous materials, and investment in climate-specific research. This review contributes a comprehensive barrier framework and actionable recommendations to support the transition toward climate-responsive, energy-efficient architecture in warm-humid regions of sub-Saharan Africa.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.68086/yzqb9910first seen 2026-09-19 04:59:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。